This chapter develops a ``nesting'' model of deontic normative principles (i.e., principles that specify moral constraints upon action) as a means to understanding the notion of a ``fundamental normative principle''. I show that an apparently promising attempt to make sense of this notion such that the ``real'' or ``fundamental'' demands of justice upon action are not constrained by social facts is either self-defeating or relatively unappealing. We should treat fundamental normative principles not as specifying fundamental constraints upon action, but as specifying basic criteria for comparatively evaluating and ranking possibilities
I will say something on two or three related but distinct topics. First, something on the grounding ...
Suppose ethical theories guide us to do what is the most good and the most right but conflicts aris...
Justice is a natural virtue. Well-functioning humans are just, as are well-ordered human societies. ...
This chapter develops a ``nesting'' model of deontic normative principles (i.e., principles that spe...
Here I argue that the best form of deontology is an ethic of prima facie duties, and that this form ...
Chapter 1 of this book argued that moral philosophy should be based on seven principles of theory se...
There exists a widespread consensus amongst contemporary jurisprudents, positivists and non-positivi...
Producción CientíficaDiscursive theories of justice have been questioned for putting forward high-le...
The paper considers the main arguments against the possibility that basic normative principles can c...
The present article provides a taxonomic analysis of bimodal logics of normative ideality and normat...
A prevalent assumption is that normativity is a unity. In this paper I argue against this assumption...
The paper discusses what is empirical study of justice feeling, drawing the line between this and no...
Extremism about Demands is the view that morality is significantly more demanding than prevailing co...
G.A. Cohen is famous for his critique of John Rawls’s view that principles of justice are restricted...
This book argues that moral philosophy should be based on seven scientific principles of theory sele...
I will say something on two or three related but distinct topics. First, something on the grounding ...
Suppose ethical theories guide us to do what is the most good and the most right but conflicts aris...
Justice is a natural virtue. Well-functioning humans are just, as are well-ordered human societies. ...
This chapter develops a ``nesting'' model of deontic normative principles (i.e., principles that spe...
Here I argue that the best form of deontology is an ethic of prima facie duties, and that this form ...
Chapter 1 of this book argued that moral philosophy should be based on seven principles of theory se...
There exists a widespread consensus amongst contemporary jurisprudents, positivists and non-positivi...
Producción CientíficaDiscursive theories of justice have been questioned for putting forward high-le...
The paper considers the main arguments against the possibility that basic normative principles can c...
The present article provides a taxonomic analysis of bimodal logics of normative ideality and normat...
A prevalent assumption is that normativity is a unity. In this paper I argue against this assumption...
The paper discusses what is empirical study of justice feeling, drawing the line between this and no...
Extremism about Demands is the view that morality is significantly more demanding than prevailing co...
G.A. Cohen is famous for his critique of John Rawls’s view that principles of justice are restricted...
This book argues that moral philosophy should be based on seven scientific principles of theory sele...
I will say something on two or three related but distinct topics. First, something on the grounding ...
Suppose ethical theories guide us to do what is the most good and the most right but conflicts aris...
Justice is a natural virtue. Well-functioning humans are just, as are well-ordered human societies. ...