Some theorists have developed formal approaches to truth that depend on counterexamples to the structural rules of contraction. Here, we study such approaches, with an eye to helping them respond to a certain kind of objection. We define a contractive relative of each noncontractive relation, for use in responding to the objection in question, and we explore one example: the contractive relative of multiplicative-additive affine logic with transparent truth, or MAALT
Substructural logics and their application to logical and semantic paradoxes have been extensively s...
This chapter describes a nonmonotonic causal logic designed for representing knowledge about the eff...
A non-embracing consequence relation is one such that no set of wffs closed under it is equal to the...
Some theorists have developed formal approaches to truth that depend on counterexamples to the struc...
The paper investigates from a proof-theoretic perspective various non-contractive logical systems, w...
An important question for proponents of non-contractive approaches to paradox is why contraction fai...
Dave Ripley has recently argued against the plausibility of multiset consequence relations and of co...
This is the text of my speech at the Logica Universalis webinar, which took place on May 11, 2022. ...
A logic is said to be contraction free if the rule from A → (A →B) to A →B is not truth preserving. ...
AbstractIn this paper we present a systematic study of abductive consequence relations. We show that...
I discuss paradoxes of implication in the setting of a proof-conditional theory of meaning for l...
AbstractThe nonmonotonic causal logic defined in this paper can be used to represent properties of a...
The idea of belief revision is strictly connected with the notion of contraction given by the set of...
AbstractWe establish the “contraction-elimination theorem” which means that if a sequent Γ ⇒ A is pr...
We present a decision-theoretically motivated notion of contraction which, we claim, encodes the pri...
Substructural logics and their application to logical and semantic paradoxes have been extensively s...
This chapter describes a nonmonotonic causal logic designed for representing knowledge about the eff...
A non-embracing consequence relation is one such that no set of wffs closed under it is equal to the...
Some theorists have developed formal approaches to truth that depend on counterexamples to the struc...
The paper investigates from a proof-theoretic perspective various non-contractive logical systems, w...
An important question for proponents of non-contractive approaches to paradox is why contraction fai...
Dave Ripley has recently argued against the plausibility of multiset consequence relations and of co...
This is the text of my speech at the Logica Universalis webinar, which took place on May 11, 2022. ...
A logic is said to be contraction free if the rule from A → (A →B) to A →B is not truth preserving. ...
AbstractIn this paper we present a systematic study of abductive consequence relations. We show that...
I discuss paradoxes of implication in the setting of a proof-conditional theory of meaning for l...
AbstractThe nonmonotonic causal logic defined in this paper can be used to represent properties of a...
The idea of belief revision is strictly connected with the notion of contraction given by the set of...
AbstractWe establish the “contraction-elimination theorem” which means that if a sequent Γ ⇒ A is pr...
We present a decision-theoretically motivated notion of contraction which, we claim, encodes the pri...
Substructural logics and their application to logical and semantic paradoxes have been extensively s...
This chapter describes a nonmonotonic causal logic designed for representing knowledge about the eff...
A non-embracing consequence relation is one such that no set of wffs closed under it is equal to the...