Add to ORKGI offer eight arguments against the Doctrine of Double Effect, a normative principle according to which in pursuing the good it is sometimes morally permissible to bring about some evil as a side-effect or merely foreseen consequence: the same evil would not be morally justified as an intended means or end
I argue against the Doctrine of Double Effect’s explanation of the moral difference between terror b...
Unintended killing and harming to civilians is a common problem in war. The Just of War theory uses ...
In this paper, I will present a Kantian revision of the Doctrine of Double Effect (DDE). In order to...
I offer eight arguments against the Doctrine of Double Effect, a normative principle according to wh...
The standard version of the doctrine of double effect, a significant doctrine in applied ethics part...
The ‘doctrine of double effect’ claims that it is in some sense morally less problematic t...
The “principle of double effect” is a vital tool for moral decision making and is applicab...
The article discusses the conditions to which an action with two effects or double-effect, one good ...
In this paper, I discuss a possible moral difference between terrorism and war. The standard approac...
The Principle of Double Effect has served as a guide for both statesmen and soldiers since the middl...
T. A. Cavanaugh defends double-effect reasoning (DER), also known as the principle of double effect....
Assessing morality in armed conflicts raises a host of issues, not least of which is accounting for ...
Common morality endorses some form of an exceptionless prohibition against killing innocents. Natura...
I argue against the Doctrine of Double Effect’s explanation of the moral difference between terror b...
Unintended killing and harming to civilians is a common problem in war. The Just of War theory uses ...
In this paper, I will present a Kantian revision of the Doctrine of Double Effect (DDE). In order to...
I offer eight arguments against the Doctrine of Double Effect, a normative principle according to wh...
The standard version of the doctrine of double effect, a significant doctrine in applied ethics part...
The ‘doctrine of double effect’ claims that it is in some sense morally less problematic t...
The “principle of double effect” is a vital tool for moral decision making and is applicab...
The article discusses the conditions to which an action with two effects or double-effect, one good ...
In this paper, I discuss a possible moral difference between terrorism and war. The standard approac...
The Principle of Double Effect has served as a guide for both statesmen and soldiers since the middl...
T. A. Cavanaugh defends double-effect reasoning (DER), also known as the principle of double effect....
Assessing morality in armed conflicts raises a host of issues, not least of which is accounting for ...
Common morality endorses some form of an exceptionless prohibition against killing innocents. Natura...
I argue against the Doctrine of Double Effect’s explanation of the moral difference between terror b...
Unintended killing and harming to civilians is a common problem in war. The Just of War theory uses ...
In this paper, I will present a Kantian revision of the Doctrine of Double Effect (DDE). In order to...