More troubles with cognitive neuroscience. Einstein's theory of relativity and the hyperverse

In my last two books 2012 and 2014, I investigated some important problems of cognitive neuroscience. The general conclusion of these two works (2012 and 2014) is that cognitive neuroscience is a pseudo-science. In Part I of this book 2014, Chapter 1, I introduce the EDWs perspective (from my book published in 2012). In Part II, I investigate more troubles with cognitive neuroscience. (For other troubles of this “science”, see Vacariu 2012, Vacariu and Vacariu 2013) In Chapter 2, I analyze in detail a particular aspect of human visual perception: spatial cognition. In order to be able to offer more arguments on the idea that cognitive neuroscience is a pseudoscience, I need to investigate spatial cognition, an essential feature of visual perception and one of the most important topics of cognitive neuroscience. In Chapter 3, I continue to investigate the most recent successful works in cognitive neuroscience: the Gallant’s laboratory work in relationship with “integration” and “distribution”. In Chapter 4, I analyze the multisensory integration (crossmodal interactions), a more general form of binding problem (a problem that I analyzed in Vacariu 2012). This means that from a particular sensorial system (the classical binding problem), I moved to the multisensorial integration (crossmodal interactions): at least two sensorial mechanisms are involved in creating a perceptual representation. In Chapter 5, I investigate Bechtel’s work on endogenous brain activity (I analyzed his work in my latest books) and, moreover, I update information regarding the default network and the mind-wandering (see also Vacariu 2012). In Chapter 6, I question the relationship between the micro-neuronal level, the macro-neuronal level, oscillations and cognition. An important question needs an answer: “How can we better explain cognition: using knowledge from macro-neuronal level (furnished by fMRI, EEG etc.) or micro-neuronal level or both?” The last application of EDWs perspective is on Einstein’s theory of relativity (Part III of this book 2014) just because this theory is true and it has no problems in explaining certain phenomena and it is completely recognized by specialists in physics. In Appendix, “Did Markus Gabriel (Bonn University) plagiarize my ideas?”, I analyze the UNBELIEVABLE similarities between my ideas from my works (2005, 2008, 2010, 2011, 2012) and Markus Gabriel’s ideas (Bonn University) from his book published in 2013 and his TED clip (also in 2013)