This paper shows that strict evidentialism about normative reasons for belief is inconsistent with taking truth to be the source of normative reasons for belief. It does so by showing that there are circumstances in which one can know what truth requires one to believe, yet still lack evidence for the contents of that belief
It is frequently said that belief aims at truth, in an explicitly normative sense-that is, that one ...
In this chapter, we critically examine the most important extant ways of understanding and motivatin...
I argue that, if belief is subject to a norm of truth, then that norm is evaluative rather than pres...
This paper shows that strict evidentialism about normative reasons for belief is inconsistent with t...
peer reviewedThis paper defends the view that in a certain sense evidence is normative. Neither a bi...
This paper poses a puzzle concerning a broadly held view about normative reasons for belief: evident...
To say that evidence is normative is to say that what evidence one possesses, and how this evidence ...
Evidentialism is the view that facts about whether or not an agent is justified in having a particul...
In this thesis, I raise considerations against some arguments that support evidentialism, the view t...
It seems to be a platitude that the belief that p is correct iff it is true that p. And the claim th...
That falsity is a defect in belief can be captured with a prohibitive norm holding that truth is the...
In this paper I introduce an objection to normative evidentialism about reasons for belief. The obje...
For belief, the standard of correctness is truth. Truth is said to be the norm of belief. This thesi...
Evidentialism is the thesis that all reasons to believe p are evidence for p. Pragmatists hold that ...
In this paper I argue that Evidentialism is unsatisfactory as a general account of epistemic justifi...
It is frequently said that belief aims at truth, in an explicitly normative sense-that is, that one ...
In this chapter, we critically examine the most important extant ways of understanding and motivatin...
I argue that, if belief is subject to a norm of truth, then that norm is evaluative rather than pres...
This paper shows that strict evidentialism about normative reasons for belief is inconsistent with t...
peer reviewedThis paper defends the view that in a certain sense evidence is normative. Neither a bi...
This paper poses a puzzle concerning a broadly held view about normative reasons for belief: evident...
To say that evidence is normative is to say that what evidence one possesses, and how this evidence ...
Evidentialism is the view that facts about whether or not an agent is justified in having a particul...
In this thesis, I raise considerations against some arguments that support evidentialism, the view t...
It seems to be a platitude that the belief that p is correct iff it is true that p. And the claim th...
That falsity is a defect in belief can be captured with a prohibitive norm holding that truth is the...
In this paper I introduce an objection to normative evidentialism about reasons for belief. The obje...
For belief, the standard of correctness is truth. Truth is said to be the norm of belief. This thesi...
Evidentialism is the thesis that all reasons to believe p are evidence for p. Pragmatists hold that ...
In this paper I argue that Evidentialism is unsatisfactory as a general account of epistemic justifi...
It is frequently said that belief aims at truth, in an explicitly normative sense-that is, that one ...
In this chapter, we critically examine the most important extant ways of understanding and motivatin...
I argue that, if belief is subject to a norm of truth, then that norm is evaluative rather than pres...
DOI
Add to ORKG