The article investigates the treatment of modality in chapters 12 and 13 of De Interpretatione and gives a new interpretation of the puzzling table of modals to be found at the beginning of chapter 13, as well as dealing with some of Aristotle’s puzzles. This is achieved by extending Aristotle’s distinction between two senses of possibility, which (following Ackrill) I call ‘one-sided’ and ‘two-sided’, to the two notions of necessity and impossibility. The conclusion is reached that, while the two notions of necessity and impossibility are logically incompatible when both are taken as one-sided, in their two-sided senses they are in fact equivalent
The distinction between potentiality and possibility in Aristotle’s modal teleology is sometimes con...
The following is a critical and historical account of Aristotelian Essentialism informed by recent w...
Aristotle in the Organon (1949: 9,30 a ,15-19) explicitly states that in a categorical syllogism whe...
The article investigates the treatment of modality in chapters 12 and 13 of De Interpretatione and g...
The article investigates the treatment of modality in chapters 12 and 13 of De Interpretatione and g...
From introduction: A popular misconception regarding Aristotle's views on modality is that Aristotle...
From introduction: A popular misconception regarding Aristotle's views on modality is that Aristotle...
The dissertation is an investigation into the structure of Aristotle\u27s modal propositions through...
Early medieval reflections on modalities are deeply indebted to the modal theories developed by Aris...
In Prior Analytics 1.1–22, Aristotle develops his proof system of non-modal and modal propositions. ...
On Some Logical Analyses of the Concepts Necessity and ExistenceHistory of modal logic begins with A...
On Some Logical Analyses of the Concepts Necessity and ExistenceHistory of modal logic begins with A...
ModaI logic is concerned with the logic of necessity and possibility. The central problem of modal ...
In De Interpretatione 6-9, Aristotle considers three logical principles: the principle of bivalence,...
The following is a critical and historical account of Aristotelian Essentialism informed by recent w...
The distinction between potentiality and possibility in Aristotle’s modal teleology is sometimes con...
The following is a critical and historical account of Aristotelian Essentialism informed by recent w...
Aristotle in the Organon (1949: 9,30 a ,15-19) explicitly states that in a categorical syllogism whe...
The article investigates the treatment of modality in chapters 12 and 13 of De Interpretatione and g...
The article investigates the treatment of modality in chapters 12 and 13 of De Interpretatione and g...
From introduction: A popular misconception regarding Aristotle's views on modality is that Aristotle...
From introduction: A popular misconception regarding Aristotle's views on modality is that Aristotle...
The dissertation is an investigation into the structure of Aristotle\u27s modal propositions through...
Early medieval reflections on modalities are deeply indebted to the modal theories developed by Aris...
In Prior Analytics 1.1–22, Aristotle develops his proof system of non-modal and modal propositions. ...
On Some Logical Analyses of the Concepts Necessity and ExistenceHistory of modal logic begins with A...
On Some Logical Analyses of the Concepts Necessity and ExistenceHistory of modal logic begins with A...
ModaI logic is concerned with the logic of necessity and possibility. The central problem of modal ...
In De Interpretatione 6-9, Aristotle considers three logical principles: the principle of bivalence,...
The following is a critical and historical account of Aristotelian Essentialism informed by recent w...
The distinction between potentiality and possibility in Aristotle’s modal teleology is sometimes con...
The following is a critical and historical account of Aristotelian Essentialism informed by recent w...
Aristotle in the Organon (1949: 9,30 a ,15-19) explicitly states that in a categorical syllogism whe...