In “Naming and Necessity” Saul Kripke describes some cases which, he claims, provide counterexamples both to cluster theories and, more generally, to description theories of proper names. My view of these cases is that while they do not provide counterexamples to cluster theories, they can be used to provide evidence against single-description theories. In this paper I shall defend both of the claims involved in my view
Saul Kripke in his revolutionary and influential series of lectures from the early 1970s (later publ...
Kripke, in "Naming and Necessity", defended answers to two kinds of questions about names and refere...
Artykuł porusza problematykę nazw własnych w ujęciu S.A. Kripkego, które na gruncie filozofii analit...
In “Naming and Necessity” Saul Kripke describes some cases which, he claims, provide counterexamples...
This paper provides a defense of the description theory of proper names by constructing a ‘two-compo...
It is generally thought that Searle's cluster theory of the sense of a proper name was soundly refut...
[EN]This work will focus on some aspects of descriptive names. The New Theory of Reference, in line...
I hereby declare that I am the sole author of this thesis. This is a true copy of the thesis, includ...
In this paper I discuss a set of puzzles arising from belief reports containing proper names. In sec...
Around 1970, both Keith Donnellan and Saul Kripke produced powerful arguments against description th...
Around 1970, both Keith Donnellan and Saul Kripke produced powerful arguments against description th...
According to theories of rigid designation and direct reference, proper names refer without interven...
Abstract: This paper has two purposes: the first is to critically examine Kripke’s well-known argume...
This work will focus on some aspects of descriptive names. The New Theory of Reference, in line with...
This article systematically challenges Kripke's modal argument and Soames's defence of thi...
Saul Kripke in his revolutionary and influential series of lectures from the early 1970s (later publ...
Kripke, in "Naming and Necessity", defended answers to two kinds of questions about names and refere...
Artykuł porusza problematykę nazw własnych w ujęciu S.A. Kripkego, które na gruncie filozofii analit...
In “Naming and Necessity” Saul Kripke describes some cases which, he claims, provide counterexamples...
This paper provides a defense of the description theory of proper names by constructing a ‘two-compo...
It is generally thought that Searle's cluster theory of the sense of a proper name was soundly refut...
[EN]This work will focus on some aspects of descriptive names. The New Theory of Reference, in line...
I hereby declare that I am the sole author of this thesis. This is a true copy of the thesis, includ...
In this paper I discuss a set of puzzles arising from belief reports containing proper names. In sec...
Around 1970, both Keith Donnellan and Saul Kripke produced powerful arguments against description th...
Around 1970, both Keith Donnellan and Saul Kripke produced powerful arguments against description th...
According to theories of rigid designation and direct reference, proper names refer without interven...
Abstract: This paper has two purposes: the first is to critically examine Kripke’s well-known argume...
This work will focus on some aspects of descriptive names. The New Theory of Reference, in line with...
This article systematically challenges Kripke's modal argument and Soames's defence of thi...
Saul Kripke in his revolutionary and influential series of lectures from the early 1970s (later publ...
Kripke, in "Naming and Necessity", defended answers to two kinds of questions about names and refere...
Artykuł porusza problematykę nazw własnych w ujęciu S.A. Kripkego, które na gruncie filozofii analit...