In this brief response to Professor Guiora's article, the author questions the lawfulness of pre-emptive self-defence in the context of international terrorism. He further argues that Article 51 as it is currently interpreted and the relevant rules on State responsibility provide an adequate legal protection to States. The response also addresses the question of judicial review by national courts over the executive's decision to resort to military force
To the extent that the intervention in Iraq in 2003 is regarded as an act of preemptive self-defense...
This article analyses the recent state practice inwhich the right of self-defence hasbeen invoked in...
The Caroline Case with its principles of necessity, proportionality and immediacy is alleged to be p...
In this brief response to Professor Guiora's article, the author questions the lawfulness of pre-emp...
In this brief response to Professor Guiora's article, the author questions the lawfulness of pre-emp...
This commentary examines the "strict-scrutiny" approach to self-defence as proposed by Professor Amo...
The first condition for the legal use of force in self-defence is that the state exercising this rig...
This article makes the distinction between self-defence, anticipatory self-defence and pre-emption. ...
The threat or use of force in international relations has been unlawful since the UN Charter entered...
Self-defense has been historically recognized as a legitimate action by the international community ...
The article analyses the concept of self-defence against non-state actors – terrorist groups. The ev...
A consideration of Terrorism and state responses under International law, looking particularly at th...
The last decade has witnessed increased recourse by states to military force to respond to terrorist...
This contribution examines the problem of what is the legal basis for armed interventions carried ou...
This article examines the most pertinent questions relating to the applicability of the right of sel...
To the extent that the intervention in Iraq in 2003 is regarded as an act of preemptive self-defense...
This article analyses the recent state practice inwhich the right of self-defence hasbeen invoked in...
The Caroline Case with its principles of necessity, proportionality and immediacy is alleged to be p...
In this brief response to Professor Guiora's article, the author questions the lawfulness of pre-emp...
In this brief response to Professor Guiora's article, the author questions the lawfulness of pre-emp...
This commentary examines the "strict-scrutiny" approach to self-defence as proposed by Professor Amo...
The first condition for the legal use of force in self-defence is that the state exercising this rig...
This article makes the distinction between self-defence, anticipatory self-defence and pre-emption. ...
The threat or use of force in international relations has been unlawful since the UN Charter entered...
Self-defense has been historically recognized as a legitimate action by the international community ...
The article analyses the concept of self-defence against non-state actors – terrorist groups. The ev...
A consideration of Terrorism and state responses under International law, looking particularly at th...
The last decade has witnessed increased recourse by states to military force to respond to terrorist...
This contribution examines the problem of what is the legal basis for armed interventions carried ou...
This article examines the most pertinent questions relating to the applicability of the right of sel...
To the extent that the intervention in Iraq in 2003 is regarded as an act of preemptive self-defense...
This article analyses the recent state practice inwhich the right of self-defence hasbeen invoked in...
The Caroline Case with its principles of necessity, proportionality and immediacy is alleged to be p...