In Hughes-Holland v BPE Solicitors [2017] UKSC 21; [2017] 2 W.L.R. 1029, Mr. Gabriel lent £200,000 to a developer, Mr. Little. He had expected the money to be wholly employed by Mr. Little in developing a property. Mr. Little, however, used the advance to discharge borrowings secured on the property, and other liabilities. In the event, no development of any significance was carried out, the property was worthless and Mr. Gabriel's advance was lost
Copyright © 2011 LexisNexis. This article is made available per the publisher's Content Sharing poli...
The proceedings in Volcafe Ltd v Compania Sud Americana De Vapores SA were recently brought to a con...
This paper charts the progress of a complex possession action in the English county court. The case ...
This is the author accepted manuscript. The final version is available from the UK Law and Society A...
This thesis examines the law's response to defective transfers and other misapplications of assets a...
In Project Management Company No 2 Pty Ltd v Cushway Blackford & Associates Pty Ltd [2011] QCA 1...
It is rare even for a Supreme Court case to provide a judgment as consequential as Morris-Garner v O...
This note discusses a 2008 House of Lords decision on the proper test for remoteness of contractual ...
Considers Various Claimants v Giambrone and Law (A Firm) (CA) on whether the prospective buyers of p...
CITATION: Slade, B.V. 2014. Addressing the issue in Harvey v Umhlatuze Municipality in legislation. ...
Whether payments made to contractors after automatic crystallisation of floating charge had been tri...
Prior to the decision of the High Court in Black v Garnock (2007) 230 CLR 438 it was an established ...
This paper addresses the legal liability of valuers to mortgage lenders for professional negligence,...
The question for the United Kingdom Supreme Court was whether a bribe or secret commission received ...
In Phillips v Phillips, Lord Westbury stated that, against a bona fide purchaser faced with an “equi...
Copyright © 2011 LexisNexis. This article is made available per the publisher's Content Sharing poli...
The proceedings in Volcafe Ltd v Compania Sud Americana De Vapores SA were recently brought to a con...
This paper charts the progress of a complex possession action in the English county court. The case ...
This is the author accepted manuscript. The final version is available from the UK Law and Society A...
This thesis examines the law's response to defective transfers and other misapplications of assets a...
In Project Management Company No 2 Pty Ltd v Cushway Blackford & Associates Pty Ltd [2011] QCA 1...
It is rare even for a Supreme Court case to provide a judgment as consequential as Morris-Garner v O...
This note discusses a 2008 House of Lords decision on the proper test for remoteness of contractual ...
Considers Various Claimants v Giambrone and Law (A Firm) (CA) on whether the prospective buyers of p...
CITATION: Slade, B.V. 2014. Addressing the issue in Harvey v Umhlatuze Municipality in legislation. ...
Whether payments made to contractors after automatic crystallisation of floating charge had been tri...
Prior to the decision of the High Court in Black v Garnock (2007) 230 CLR 438 it was an established ...
This paper addresses the legal liability of valuers to mortgage lenders for professional negligence,...
The question for the United Kingdom Supreme Court was whether a bribe or secret commission received ...
In Phillips v Phillips, Lord Westbury stated that, against a bona fide purchaser faced with an “equi...
Copyright © 2011 LexisNexis. This article is made available per the publisher's Content Sharing poli...
The proceedings in Volcafe Ltd v Compania Sud Americana De Vapores SA were recently brought to a con...
This paper charts the progress of a complex possession action in the English county court. The case ...