The use of a one-dimensional "hierarchy of study designs" to grade the evidence on the effectiveness of healthcare interventions is problematic as it may underestimate the limitations of randomized controlled trials and overstate those of observational studies. Observational studies can be an alternative to randomized controlled trials or a source of complementary information. The role of observational studies will vary in different situations. Depending on their topic, design, and methods of analysis, observational studies may be as credible as randomized studies
Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) are often challenging to design in surgical fields and can be mi...
For estimating causal effects of treatments, randomized experiments are generally considered the gol...
The article discusses the main methods of evidence in modern medicine. Special attention is paid to ...
The use of a one-dimensional "hierarchy of study designs" to grade the evidence on the effectiveness...
In evidence-based medicine, clinical research questions may be addressed by different study designs....
Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) are considered the gold standard study design to investigate the...
BECAUSE OF PRESSURE FOR TIMELYand informed decisions in pub-lic health and medicine and theexplosion...
Abstract: Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) constitute the gold standard for the generation of evi...
Transplantation offers a unique opportunity to demonstrate the complementary roles of randomized con...
Although not the gold standard of clinical research, observational studies can play a central role a...
Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) are considered the gold standard study design to investigate the...
Aims: The hierarchy of evidence-based medicine determines the inferential powers of different clinic...
Health outcomes research applies a wide range of meth-ods to identify optimal approaches to determin...
Item does not contain fulltextThe randomized controlled trial (RCT) in surgery may not always be eth...
Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) are considered the gold standard for clinical research, thus hav...
Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) are often challenging to design in surgical fields and can be mi...
For estimating causal effects of treatments, randomized experiments are generally considered the gol...
The article discusses the main methods of evidence in modern medicine. Special attention is paid to ...
The use of a one-dimensional "hierarchy of study designs" to grade the evidence on the effectiveness...
In evidence-based medicine, clinical research questions may be addressed by different study designs....
Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) are considered the gold standard study design to investigate the...
BECAUSE OF PRESSURE FOR TIMELYand informed decisions in pub-lic health and medicine and theexplosion...
Abstract: Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) constitute the gold standard for the generation of evi...
Transplantation offers a unique opportunity to demonstrate the complementary roles of randomized con...
Although not the gold standard of clinical research, observational studies can play a central role a...
Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) are considered the gold standard study design to investigate the...
Aims: The hierarchy of evidence-based medicine determines the inferential powers of different clinic...
Health outcomes research applies a wide range of meth-ods to identify optimal approaches to determin...
Item does not contain fulltextThe randomized controlled trial (RCT) in surgery may not always be eth...
Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) are considered the gold standard for clinical research, thus hav...
Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) are often challenging to design in surgical fields and can be mi...
For estimating causal effects of treatments, randomized experiments are generally considered the gol...
The article discusses the main methods of evidence in modern medicine. Special attention is paid to ...