A recent decision of the General Court of the European Union (Case T-18/10 Inuit Tapiriit Kanatami and Others v EP and Council, Order of 6 September 2011) illustrates once again the limited options available to NGOs wishing to contest a decision of the European institutions before the courts. This paper deals with the first case law of the General Court on access to justice ex Article 263 TFEU in the post-Lissabon wording of that provision.
There is a clear normative tension between the immunities of international organizations and the hum...
In its case-law, the European Court of Human Rights has usually protected the right of access to cou...
In an international legal order dominated by states, the individual citizen is generally viewed as l...
A recent decision of the General Court of the European Union (Case T-18/10 Inuit Tapiriit Kanatami a...
The paper examines, in the light of the most recent case-law, the problem of standing before the EU ...
There is not only a long and commonly held (academic) opinion, but also an international obligation ...
Over the years, much ink has been spilled in the debate on standing of NGOs before the EU courts. Th...
Within Europe there is an overlap between the treaty regimes of the ECHR, EU and that of Convention ...
Article 263.4 TFEU introduces new rules of standing for private parties concerning regulatory acts n...
Working Paper ETUI 2022.13Working Paper ETUI 2022.13 (English version)Working Paper ETUI 2022.13 : h...
Rules on standing hold the power to enable, as well as to foreclose, intervention in regulatory proc...
This article focuses on the increasing influence of international court rulings on the development o...
Stichting Varkens in Nood shows that EU law can have farreaching consequences for national administr...
The Access to Court for Environmental Organisations under the Impact of Public International Law and...
Some recent decisions of the highest court in the European Union (EU) verge on the hypocritical: on ...
There is a clear normative tension between the immunities of international organizations and the hum...
In its case-law, the European Court of Human Rights has usually protected the right of access to cou...
In an international legal order dominated by states, the individual citizen is generally viewed as l...
A recent decision of the General Court of the European Union (Case T-18/10 Inuit Tapiriit Kanatami a...
The paper examines, in the light of the most recent case-law, the problem of standing before the EU ...
There is not only a long and commonly held (academic) opinion, but also an international obligation ...
Over the years, much ink has been spilled in the debate on standing of NGOs before the EU courts. Th...
Within Europe there is an overlap between the treaty regimes of the ECHR, EU and that of Convention ...
Article 263.4 TFEU introduces new rules of standing for private parties concerning regulatory acts n...
Working Paper ETUI 2022.13Working Paper ETUI 2022.13 (English version)Working Paper ETUI 2022.13 : h...
Rules on standing hold the power to enable, as well as to foreclose, intervention in regulatory proc...
This article focuses on the increasing influence of international court rulings on the development o...
Stichting Varkens in Nood shows that EU law can have farreaching consequences for national administr...
The Access to Court for Environmental Organisations under the Impact of Public International Law and...
Some recent decisions of the highest court in the European Union (EU) verge on the hypocritical: on ...
There is a clear normative tension between the immunities of international organizations and the hum...
In its case-law, the European Court of Human Rights has usually protected the right of access to cou...
In an international legal order dominated by states, the individual citizen is generally viewed as l...
DOI
Add to ORKG