The subject of this thesis is reasoning with evidence to establish the facts in criminal cases. In al legal context, the study of evidence is often equated with the study of the "law of evidence", for example, the legal rules of evidence that govern which types of evidence are legally valid or admissible. However, a large part of the study of evidence constitutes the study of the "rational process of proof, which concerns the facts of the case rather than the legal specifics. The reasoning in the process of proof, which is discussed in chapter 2, involves constructing, testing and justifying comp0lex hypotheses about what happened in a case using evidence (e.g. witness statements, tangible evidence such as a knife or blood) and general comm...
In this article, we provide a formal logical model of evidential reasoning with proof standards and ...
Abstract In this paper, we look at reasoning with evidence and facts in criminal cases. We show how ...
We present a computational argumentation approach that models legal reasoning with evidence and proo...
This paper presents a theory of reasoning with evidence in order to determine the facts in a crimina...
Abstract In this paper, we continue our research on a hybrid narrative-argumentative approach to evi...
In the literature on reasoning on the basis of evidence, two traditions exist: one argument-based, a...
In this paper, we continue our research on a hybrid narrative-argumentative approach to evidential r...
As a result of recent scandals concerning evidence and proof in the administration of criminal justi...
As a result of recent scandals concerning evidence and proof in the administration of criminal justi...
In this paper, we look at reasoning with evidence and facts in criminal cases. We show how this reas...
In this paper, we look at reasoning with evidence and facts in criminal cases. We show how this reas...
In this paper, we look at reasoning with evidence and facts in criminal cases. We show how this reas...
Abstract In this paper, we look at reasoning with evidence and facts in criminal cases. We show how ...
In this paper, we provide a formal logical model of evidential reasoning with proof standards and bu...
In this article, we provide a formal logical model of evidential reasoning with proof standards and ...
Abstract In this paper, we look at reasoning with evidence and facts in criminal cases. We show how ...
We present a computational argumentation approach that models legal reasoning with evidence and proo...
This paper presents a theory of reasoning with evidence in order to determine the facts in a crimina...
Abstract In this paper, we continue our research on a hybrid narrative-argumentative approach to evi...
In the literature on reasoning on the basis of evidence, two traditions exist: one argument-based, a...
In this paper, we continue our research on a hybrid narrative-argumentative approach to evidential r...
As a result of recent scandals concerning evidence and proof in the administration of criminal justi...
As a result of recent scandals concerning evidence and proof in the administration of criminal justi...
In this paper, we look at reasoning with evidence and facts in criminal cases. We show how this reas...
In this paper, we look at reasoning with evidence and facts in criminal cases. We show how this reas...
In this paper, we look at reasoning with evidence and facts in criminal cases. We show how this reas...
Abstract In this paper, we look at reasoning with evidence and facts in criminal cases. We show how ...
In this paper, we provide a formal logical model of evidential reasoning with proof standards and bu...
In this article, we provide a formal logical model of evidential reasoning with proof standards and ...
Abstract In this paper, we look at reasoning with evidence and facts in criminal cases. We show how ...
We present a computational argumentation approach that models legal reasoning with evidence and proo...