We reconsider the conceptual foundations of the renormalization-group (RG) formalism. We show that the RG map, defined on a suitable space of interactions, is always single valued and Lipschitz continuous on its domain of definition. This rules out a recently proposed scenario for the RG description of first-order phase transitions. On the other hand, we prove in several cases that near a first-order phase transition the renormalized measure is not a Gibbs measure for any reasonable interaction. It follows that the conventional RG description of first-order transitions is not universally valid.
We reconsider the conceptual foundations of the renormalization-group (RG) formalism, and prove some...
We reconsider the conceptual foundations of the renormalization-group (RG) formalism, and prove some...
We reconsider the conceptual foundations of the renormalization-group (RG) formalism, and prove some...
We reconsider the conceptual foundations of the renormalization-group (RG) formalism. We show that t...
We reconsider the conceptual foundations of the renormalization-group (RG) formalism. We show that t...
We reconsider the conceptual foundations of the renormalization-group (RG) formalism. We show that t...
We reconsider the conceptual foundations of the renormalization-group (RG) formalism. We show that t...
We reconsider the conceptual foundations of the renormalization-group (RG) formalism. We show that t...
We reconsider the conceptual foundations of the renormalization-group (RG) formalism. We show that t...
We reconsider the conceptual foundations of the renormalization-group (RG) formalism. We show that t...
We reconsider the conceptual foundations of the renormalization-group (RG) formalism. We show that t...
We reconsider the conceptual foundations of the renormalization-group (RG) formalism. We show that t...
We reconsider the conceptual foundations of the renormalization-group (RG) formalism, and prove some...
We reconsider the conceptual foundations of the renormalization-group (RG) formalism, and prove some...
We reconsider the conceptual foundations of the renormalization-group (RG) formalism, and prove some...
We reconsider the conceptual foundations of the renormalization-group (RG) formalism, and prove some...
We reconsider the conceptual foundations of the renormalization-group (RG) formalism, and prove some...
We reconsider the conceptual foundations of the renormalization-group (RG) formalism, and prove some...
We reconsider the conceptual foundations of the renormalization-group (RG) formalism. We show that t...
We reconsider the conceptual foundations of the renormalization-group (RG) formalism. We show that t...
We reconsider the conceptual foundations of the renormalization-group (RG) formalism. We show that t...
We reconsider the conceptual foundations of the renormalization-group (RG) formalism. We show that t...
We reconsider the conceptual foundations of the renormalization-group (RG) formalism. We show that t...
We reconsider the conceptual foundations of the renormalization-group (RG) formalism. We show that t...
We reconsider the conceptual foundations of the renormalization-group (RG) formalism. We show that t...
We reconsider the conceptual foundations of the renormalization-group (RG) formalism. We show that t...
We reconsider the conceptual foundations of the renormalization-group (RG) formalism. We show that t...
We reconsider the conceptual foundations of the renormalization-group (RG) formalism, and prove some...
We reconsider the conceptual foundations of the renormalization-group (RG) formalism, and prove some...
We reconsider the conceptual foundations of the renormalization-group (RG) formalism, and prove some...
We reconsider the conceptual foundations of the renormalization-group (RG) formalism, and prove some...
We reconsider the conceptual foundations of the renormalization-group (RG) formalism, and prove some...
We reconsider the conceptual foundations of the renormalization-group (RG) formalism, and prove some...