Add to ORKGThe United States Supreme Court, in a six to three decision, on June 25 created a different playing field for commodity check-off programs. The decision promises to be the center of the debate over mandatory check-off programs for several years. In the case before the court, United States v. United Foods, Inc., the court said that the mandatory mushroom check-off violates the First Amendment free speech rights of mushroom producers
In the wake of the 1989 controversy over Alar use on apples, several states enacted laws providing a...
In the wake of a 1989 national television broadcast reporting the alleged cancer risk of a chemical ...
In the past fourteen years, the Supreme Court has ruled three separate times on the constitutionalit...
On July 8, 2003, the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit affirmed the Federal Dist...
Over the past thirty-five years, Congress has authorized generic promotion programs, known as checko...
Over the past thirty-five years, Congress has authorized promotion programs, known as checkoff progr...
NICPRE 01-02; R.B. 2001-04In June of 2001, the US Supreme Court ruled that an industry-financed prom...
This report begins with a brief introduction to check-off programs and then describes many of the F...
It was like landing two punches in rapid succession to the livestock industry’s checkoff programs. I...
A major battle in First Amendment free speech rights is raging over the constitutionality of mandato...
Until recently, the legal status of generic advertising programs seemed questionable. After an initi...
On May 23, 2005, the U.S. Supreme Court upheld the federally-mandated beef promotion program against...
The First Amendment not only protects against limitations on one\u27s speech but against governmenta...
This Comment analyzes the likelihood of whether BPI’s case against ABC News will be decided on the m...
In recent years the Supreme Court has decided a spate of cases about the compelled subsidization of ...
In the wake of the 1989 controversy over Alar use on apples, several states enacted laws providing a...
In the wake of a 1989 national television broadcast reporting the alleged cancer risk of a chemical ...
In the past fourteen years, the Supreme Court has ruled three separate times on the constitutionalit...
On July 8, 2003, the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit affirmed the Federal Dist...
Over the past thirty-five years, Congress has authorized generic promotion programs, known as checko...
Over the past thirty-five years, Congress has authorized promotion programs, known as checkoff progr...
NICPRE 01-02; R.B. 2001-04In June of 2001, the US Supreme Court ruled that an industry-financed prom...
This report begins with a brief introduction to check-off programs and then describes many of the F...
It was like landing two punches in rapid succession to the livestock industry’s checkoff programs. I...
A major battle in First Amendment free speech rights is raging over the constitutionality of mandato...
Until recently, the legal status of generic advertising programs seemed questionable. After an initi...
On May 23, 2005, the U.S. Supreme Court upheld the federally-mandated beef promotion program against...
The First Amendment not only protects against limitations on one\u27s speech but against governmenta...
This Comment analyzes the likelihood of whether BPI’s case against ABC News will be decided on the m...
In recent years the Supreme Court has decided a spate of cases about the compelled subsidization of ...
In the wake of the 1989 controversy over Alar use on apples, several states enacted laws providing a...
In the wake of a 1989 national television broadcast reporting the alleged cancer risk of a chemical ...
In the past fourteen years, the Supreme Court has ruled three separate times on the constitutionalit...