Add to ORKGAn innkeeper is liable under NRS 651.015 if an injured patron can show that they suffered foreseeable harm; foreseeability is established when the innkeeper fails to exercise due care for the safety of its patrons or if the innkeeper had notice or knowledge of prior incidents of similar acts on the premises. Notice or knowledge of prior incidents of similar acts is a case-by-case analysis, and requires the district court consider similar wrongful acts in terms of the location of the attack, level of violence, and implicated security concerns
In their efforts to provide an atmosphere or hospitality to their casino customers, many operators w...
Defendant was co-owner of an apartment house and occupied one of the apartments. Plaintiff, his invi...
The Court determined that the district court erred when it precluded the appellant from testifying b...
An innkeeper is liable under NRS 651.015 if an injured patron can show that they suffered foreseeabl...
Many of the earliest cases of which reports are extant deal with the liability of the innkeeper to h...
Respondents, Dedric Holman and Christina Edwards, were gambling at the Gold Coast Hotel when a physi...
A party asserting a breach of an ordinary course covenant carries the burden to demonstrate that the...
In an action seeking damages, based on the alleged negligence of a bailee for hire in causing the lo...
Plaintiff as patron of defendant\u27s theater, while in the ladies\u27 room located on one of the to...
The Nevada Court of Appeals determined that the recent amendments to the Nevada Rules of Civil Proce...
In a jurisdiction having a statute prohibiting sales of liquor to minors and persons actually or app...
City of Philadelphia v. Cohen, 11 N.Y.2d 401, 184 N.E.2d 167, 230 N.Y.S.2d 188 (1962)
The problems associated with human mobility require constant testing and refining of the principles ...
The Court held that jury instructions must be aligned with a Nevada statute if the Nevada statute ha...
The Supreme Court of North Carolina\u27s decision in Foster v. Winston-Salem Joint Venture joins a l...
In their efforts to provide an atmosphere or hospitality to their casino customers, many operators w...
Defendant was co-owner of an apartment house and occupied one of the apartments. Plaintiff, his invi...
The Court determined that the district court erred when it precluded the appellant from testifying b...
An innkeeper is liable under NRS 651.015 if an injured patron can show that they suffered foreseeabl...
Many of the earliest cases of which reports are extant deal with the liability of the innkeeper to h...
Respondents, Dedric Holman and Christina Edwards, were gambling at the Gold Coast Hotel when a physi...
A party asserting a breach of an ordinary course covenant carries the burden to demonstrate that the...
In an action seeking damages, based on the alleged negligence of a bailee for hire in causing the lo...
Plaintiff as patron of defendant\u27s theater, while in the ladies\u27 room located on one of the to...
The Nevada Court of Appeals determined that the recent amendments to the Nevada Rules of Civil Proce...
In a jurisdiction having a statute prohibiting sales of liquor to minors and persons actually or app...
City of Philadelphia v. Cohen, 11 N.Y.2d 401, 184 N.E.2d 167, 230 N.Y.S.2d 188 (1962)
The problems associated with human mobility require constant testing and refining of the principles ...
The Court held that jury instructions must be aligned with a Nevada statute if the Nevada statute ha...
The Supreme Court of North Carolina\u27s decision in Foster v. Winston-Salem Joint Venture joins a l...
In their efforts to provide an atmosphere or hospitality to their casino customers, many operators w...
Defendant was co-owner of an apartment house and occupied one of the apartments. Plaintiff, his invi...
The Court determined that the district court erred when it precluded the appellant from testifying b...