Selective reporting is prevalent in the medical literature, particularly in industry-sponsored research. In this paper, we expose selective reporting that is not evident without access to internal company documents. The published report of study 329 of paroxetine in adolescents sponsored by GlaxoSmithKline claims that “paroxetine is generally well tolerated and effective for major depression in adolescents”. By contrast, documents obtained during litigation reveal that study 329 was negative for efficacy on all 8 protocol specified outcomes and positive for harm.Jon N. Jureidini, Leemon B. McHenry, Peter R. Mansfiel
BACKGROUND: Valid assessment of drug efficacy and safety requires an evidence base free of reporting...
Background Questions concerning the safety of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) in the...
Knowledge about adverse effects of a medication is essential to assess treatment benefits versus ris...
In this case study from litigation, we show how ghostwriting of clinical trial results can contribut...
drug industry’s burying unfavorable clinical data (“Buried data can be hazardous to a company’s heal...
Evidence-based medicine is valuable to the extent that the evidence base is complete and unbiased. S...
Study 329 is a poster-child for the so-called crisis in evidence-based medicine. Published in 2001 b...
Medical ghostwriting is the practice in which pharmaceutical companies engage an outside writer to d...
ABSTRACT: Many studies have shown that there is an association between a positive outcome of clinica...
Abstract Objectives To investigate the relative impact on publication bias caused by multiple public...
Abstract Background Previous studies have documented strategies to promote off-label use of drugs us...
Background Previous studies on reporting bias generally examined whether trials were published in st...
OBJECTIVE: Selective reporting impairs the valid interpretation of trials and leads to bias with reg...
ObjectiveTo examine the degree of concordance in reporting serious adverse events (SAEs) from antide...
Journals are failing in their obligation to ensure that research is fairly represented to their read...
BACKGROUND: Valid assessment of drug efficacy and safety requires an evidence base free of reporting...
Background Questions concerning the safety of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) in the...
Knowledge about adverse effects of a medication is essential to assess treatment benefits versus ris...
In this case study from litigation, we show how ghostwriting of clinical trial results can contribut...
drug industry’s burying unfavorable clinical data (“Buried data can be hazardous to a company’s heal...
Evidence-based medicine is valuable to the extent that the evidence base is complete and unbiased. S...
Study 329 is a poster-child for the so-called crisis in evidence-based medicine. Published in 2001 b...
Medical ghostwriting is the practice in which pharmaceutical companies engage an outside writer to d...
ABSTRACT: Many studies have shown that there is an association between a positive outcome of clinica...
Abstract Objectives To investigate the relative impact on publication bias caused by multiple public...
Abstract Background Previous studies have documented strategies to promote off-label use of drugs us...
Background Previous studies on reporting bias generally examined whether trials were published in st...
OBJECTIVE: Selective reporting impairs the valid interpretation of trials and leads to bias with reg...
ObjectiveTo examine the degree of concordance in reporting serious adverse events (SAEs) from antide...
Journals are failing in their obligation to ensure that research is fairly represented to their read...
BACKGROUND: Valid assessment of drug efficacy and safety requires an evidence base free of reporting...
Background Questions concerning the safety of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) in the...
Knowledge about adverse effects of a medication is essential to assess treatment benefits versus ris...