This paper evaluates the role of limited rationality in an equilibrium model with indeterminacy of rational expectations. We assume a world in which a fraction of agents makes predictions via rational expectations and the other fraction follows simple rule-of-thumb schemes. For all considered cases, the co-presence of naive agents tends to reduce the possibility of sunspot equilibria. We also consider the case that some agents are systematically exuberant. Under this scenario, the effect of naive agents is reversed: bullishness may in fact destabilize markets
This paper explores the extent to which the lack of rationality of economic agents has affected the ...
Evolutionary game theory provides a fresh perspective on the prospects that agents with heterogeneou...
We study how the use of judgement or “add-factors” in macroeconomic forecasting may disturb the set ...
ElsevierA growing number of studies has raised concerns about the empirical and theoretical content ...
This paper demonstrates that heterogeneity in expectations may alter a model’s regions of determinac...
Rational expectations are not required to follow from beliefs that explain well history, but just to...
We study how the use of judgment or "add-factors" in forecasting may disturb the set of equilibrium ...
This paper models expectation formation by taking into account that agents may produce heterogeneous...
One of the great achievement of General Equilibrium Theory was to prove, in the 1950s existence of a...
Rational expectations do not require beliefs to be consistent with history and with what agents can ...
Abstract: This paper models expectation formation by taking into account that agents produce heterog...
Can boundedly rational agents survive competition with fully rational agents? The authors develop a ...
Abstract. Rational beliefs are expectations which though consistent with empirical observations, may...
Rational expectations assumes perfect, model consistency between beliefs and market realizations. He...
This paper analyzes conditions for rationalizability of rational expectations equilibria of asset ma...
This paper explores the extent to which the lack of rationality of economic agents has affected the ...
Evolutionary game theory provides a fresh perspective on the prospects that agents with heterogeneou...
We study how the use of judgement or “add-factors” in macroeconomic forecasting may disturb the set ...
ElsevierA growing number of studies has raised concerns about the empirical and theoretical content ...
This paper demonstrates that heterogeneity in expectations may alter a model’s regions of determinac...
Rational expectations are not required to follow from beliefs that explain well history, but just to...
We study how the use of judgment or "add-factors" in forecasting may disturb the set of equilibrium ...
This paper models expectation formation by taking into account that agents may produce heterogeneous...
One of the great achievement of General Equilibrium Theory was to prove, in the 1950s existence of a...
Rational expectations do not require beliefs to be consistent with history and with what agents can ...
Abstract: This paper models expectation formation by taking into account that agents produce heterog...
Can boundedly rational agents survive competition with fully rational agents? The authors develop a ...
Abstract. Rational beliefs are expectations which though consistent with empirical observations, may...
Rational expectations assumes perfect, model consistency between beliefs and market realizations. He...
This paper analyzes conditions for rationalizability of rational expectations equilibria of asset ma...
This paper explores the extent to which the lack of rationality of economic agents has affected the ...
Evolutionary game theory provides a fresh perspective on the prospects that agents with heterogeneou...
We study how the use of judgement or “add-factors” in macroeconomic forecasting may disturb the set ...