A party in power can address a limited number of issues. What issues to address--the party's agenda--has dynamic implications because it affects what issues will be addressed in the future. We analyze a model in which the incumbent addresses one issue among many and the remaining issues roll over to the next period. We show that no strategic manipulation arises without checks and balances and identify strategic manipulations in the forms of waiting for the moment, seizing the moment, steering, and preemption with checks and balances depending on how power fluctuates. We also discuss efficiency implications
This paper models a legislature in which the same agenda setter serves for two periods, showing how ...
This paper models a purely informational mechanism behind the incumbency advantage. In a two-period ...
Empirical results indicate that politicians exploit issue ownership—the degree to which the public t...
This dissertation examines how partisan control of the voting agenda generates far-reaching and sign...
This paper proposes a model where the set of issues that are decisive in an election (i.e., the set ...
This chapter examines: -The meaning of punctuated equilibrium, policy community and monopoly. - The ...
Framing effects and bounded rationality imply that election campaigns may be an important determinan...
We analyze a dynamic model of agenda formation in which players compete in each period to put their ...
We study dynamic policy-making when: today's policy agreement becomes tomorrow's status quo; agents ...
Research on policy agendas and agenda-setting has developed into an important subdiscipline of compa...
This paper models a legislature in which the same agenda setter serves for two periods, showing how ...
We examine democratic policy-making in a simple institution with real-time agenda setting. Individua...
There are conflicting beliefs about the influence of parties on policy. Sceptical observers point to...
Election-oriented elites are expected to emphasize issues on which their party possesses ‘issue owne...
We analyze a dynamic model of agenda formation in which players compete in each period to put their ...
This paper models a legislature in which the same agenda setter serves for two periods, showing how ...
This paper models a purely informational mechanism behind the incumbency advantage. In a two-period ...
Empirical results indicate that politicians exploit issue ownership—the degree to which the public t...
This dissertation examines how partisan control of the voting agenda generates far-reaching and sign...
This paper proposes a model where the set of issues that are decisive in an election (i.e., the set ...
This chapter examines: -The meaning of punctuated equilibrium, policy community and monopoly. - The ...
Framing effects and bounded rationality imply that election campaigns may be an important determinan...
We analyze a dynamic model of agenda formation in which players compete in each period to put their ...
We study dynamic policy-making when: today's policy agreement becomes tomorrow's status quo; agents ...
Research on policy agendas and agenda-setting has developed into an important subdiscipline of compa...
This paper models a legislature in which the same agenda setter serves for two periods, showing how ...
We examine democratic policy-making in a simple institution with real-time agenda setting. Individua...
There are conflicting beliefs about the influence of parties on policy. Sceptical observers point to...
Election-oriented elites are expected to emphasize issues on which their party possesses ‘issue owne...
We analyze a dynamic model of agenda formation in which players compete in each period to put their ...
This paper models a legislature in which the same agenda setter serves for two periods, showing how ...
This paper models a purely informational mechanism behind the incumbency advantage. In a two-period ...
Empirical results indicate that politicians exploit issue ownership—the degree to which the public t...