The issue of nonreplicable evidence has attracted considerable attention across biomedical and other sciences. This concern is accompanied by an increasing interest in reforming research incentives and practices. How to optimally perform these reforms is a scientific problem in itself, and economics has several scientific methods that can help evaluate research reforms. Here, we review these methods and show their potential. Prominent among them are mathematical modeling and laboratory experiments that constitute affordable ways to approximate the effects of policies with wide-ranging implications
The gold standard for an empirical science is the replicability of its research results. But the est...
We developed a new probabilistic model to assess the impact of recommendations rectifying the reprod...
Does an observation constitute stronger evidence for a theory if it was made after rather than befor...
The issue of nonreplicable evidence has attracted considerable attention across biomedical and other...
There is growing interest in enhancing research transparency and reproducibility in economics and ot...
What was once broadly viewed as an impossibility—learning from experimental data in economics—has no...
We provide a brief summary of two areas where cross-fertilization across economics and other discipl...
This paper looks at an appeal to the authority of biomedical research that has recently been used by...
The sciences are in an era of an alleged ‘credibility crisis’. In this study, we discuss the reprodu...
Since Edward Leamer's memorable 1983 paper, "Let's Take the Con out of Econometrics," empirical micr...
Many view preregistration as a promising way to improve research credibility. However, scholars have...
The sciences are in an era of an alleged ‘credibility crisis.’ In this study, we discuss the reprodu...
The gold standard for an empirical science is the replicability of its research results. But the est...
We developed a new probabilistic model to assess the impact of recommendations rectifying the reprod...
The gold standard for an empirical science is the replicability of its research results. But the est...
The gold standard for an empirical science is the replicability of its research results. But the est...
We developed a new probabilistic model to assess the impact of recommendations rectifying the reprod...
Does an observation constitute stronger evidence for a theory if it was made after rather than befor...
The issue of nonreplicable evidence has attracted considerable attention across biomedical and other...
There is growing interest in enhancing research transparency and reproducibility in economics and ot...
What was once broadly viewed as an impossibility—learning from experimental data in economics—has no...
We provide a brief summary of two areas where cross-fertilization across economics and other discipl...
This paper looks at an appeal to the authority of biomedical research that has recently been used by...
The sciences are in an era of an alleged ‘credibility crisis’. In this study, we discuss the reprodu...
Since Edward Leamer's memorable 1983 paper, "Let's Take the Con out of Econometrics," empirical micr...
Many view preregistration as a promising way to improve research credibility. However, scholars have...
The sciences are in an era of an alleged ‘credibility crisis.’ In this study, we discuss the reprodu...
The gold standard for an empirical science is the replicability of its research results. But the est...
We developed a new probabilistic model to assess the impact of recommendations rectifying the reprod...
The gold standard for an empirical science is the replicability of its research results. But the est...
The gold standard for an empirical science is the replicability of its research results. But the est...
We developed a new probabilistic model to assess the impact of recommendations rectifying the reprod...
Does an observation constitute stronger evidence for a theory if it was made after rather than befor...