Phylogenetic relationships in Magnoliaceae subfam. Magnolioideae: a morphological cladistic analysis

The original publication is available at www.springerlink.comRelationships within Magnolioideae have been the subject of persistent debate; the main point at issue mostly being the disposition of tribes, genera and sections. A morphological cladistic analysis of the subfamily using Liriodendron as the out-group showed that Magnolioideae consisted of a large basal polytomy, but with five resolved and variously supported clades. Manglietia constituted a clade with sect. Rytidospermum of Magnolia subg. Magnolia. Kmeria and Woonyoungia formed a pair. Pachylarnax, Parakmeria and Manglietiastrum were grouped together, and sect. Splendentes and Dugandiodendron also formed a pair. The largest and best supported clade consisted of Magnolia subg. Magnolia sects. Oyama and Maingola, Magnolia subg. Yulania, Michelia, Aromadendron, Alcimandra, Elmerrillia, Paramichelia and Tsoongiodendron, with sect. Oyama of Magnolia subg. Magnolia is sister to the remainder. Although Magnolia sect. Maingola, Aromadendron, Alcimandra and Elmerrillia constituted a poorly resolved subclade, Aromadendron formed a monophyletic clade with Alcimandra. Within the Michelia/Magnolia subgen. Yulania subclade, Paramichelia was sister to Tsoongiodendron. These results are supported by similar placement of taxa within various molecular analyses of the family, but the low level of resolution indicates that more morphological data are needed to improve phylogenetic signal. Our results support the molecular analyses in suggesting that Magnolia is best considered to be a large and diverse genus, but that the relationships between the taxa within it require more detailed clarification, with more extensive sampling and a combined molecular and morphological approach being needed.J. Li and J. G. Conra