Progresivitas Hakim Konstitusi dalam Membuat Putusan (Analisis terhadap Keberadaan Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi yang Bersifat Positive Legislature)

Under Article 56 and Article 57 of Law Number 24 Year 2003 regarding the Constitutional Court, the position of the Constitutional Court in testing the law merely as a negative legislator. But from some of the existing ruling, the Constitutional Court made ​​several decisions that sometimes are not just cancel the norm, but also make decisions that are set (positive Legislature). In the juridical-normative perspective, the actions of the judicial activism that led to the positive position of the Legislature is a violation of boundary signs. However, if the study, some of the Constitutional Court ruling that the Legislature containing positive showing a progressive law enforcement side. Therefore, the next question is, why the judge in the Constitutional Court Act makes testing positive verdict Legislature. To answer these questions, is used qualitative research methods with the paradigms of constructivism and hermeneutic approach to the socio-legal research. From this research can be concluded that positive legislature decisions made ​​are based on legal considerations, philosophical and sociological considerations which can not be separated from interpretation of the law. Law is not only seen from the perspective of law texts, but in context to realize the benefits and justice. In this context, the law enforcement of the Constitutional Court can be categorized as a form of progressive law enforcement