PELAKSANAAN SURAT EDARAN MAHKAMAH AGUNG NOMOR 4  TAHUN 2008 TENTANG PEMUNGUTAN BIAYA PERKARA DITINJAU  DARI ASAS SEDERHANA, CEPAT, DAN BIAYA RINGAN DI  PENGADILAN NEGERI BOYOLALI

SEPTIN SURYANI. E 0005283. THE IMPLEMENTATION OF SUPREME COURT’S CIRCULAR NUMBER 4 OF 2008 ABOUT THE CASE EXPENSE COLLECTION VIEWED FROM THE SIMPLE, QUICK PRINCIPLE AND LOW COST IN BOYOLALI FIRST INSTANCE COURT. Law Faculty of Surakarta Sebelas Maret University. Thesis June 2009. This research aims to find out the implementation of the Supreme Court’s Circular Number 4 of 2008 about the Case Expense Collection viewed from the simple, quick principle and low cost in Boyolali First Instance Court and to find out the obstacles encountered in the implementation of the Supreme Court’s Circular Number 4 of 2008 about the Case Expense Collection viewed from the simple, quick principle and low cost in Boyolali First Instance Court as well as the way of coping with them. This study belongs to an empirical or sociological research that is descriptive in nature using the primary and secondary data types. The research was taken place in Boyolali First Instance Court. In this research, the techniques of collecting data used were interview and literary study. Technique of analyzing data employed was a qualitative data analysis with an interactive model. Based on the result of interview with the judge, administration staff of Boyolali First Instance Court and 3 (three) advocates, in responding to the problem of case expense collection, there is opinion dispute. the Supreme Court’s Circular Number 4 of 2008 about the Case Expense Collection, if viewed from the simple principle can be seen from two points of view: positive aspect, the process of collecting the case expense through bank is transparent, the nominal size is clear enough, thereby minimizing the case expense collection. From the negative aspect, the bureaucracy is even not simple because it does not meet the one stop service system. Viewed from the quick principle, the case expense payment has basically not been met because the justice seeker should need the time increment to pay the case expense through the Indonesian Public Bank (BRI). Viewed from the low cost principle in Boyolali First Instance Court, it can be seen from two points of view: negative aspect, the administration staff still collects the expense exceeding the basic cost, in addition the excessive down payment is rarely informed. From the positive aspect, the payment of power of attorney registration is cheaper than that previously. The obstacles and the way of coping with the implementation of case expense collection in Boyolali First Instance Court. The bureaucracy becomes not simple, the solution is BRI should establish the subsidiary in Boyolali First Instance Court, the case expense collection through the bank need much more time, the solution is the Boyolali First Instance Court and BRI should adjust their service time to the public. The administration staff collects the cost exceeding the basic cost, the solution is that the court officers should be really aware of their responsibility as the law enforcer that serves the public sincerely. Other obstacle include the rest of down payment that is not informed, the solution is there should be a good cooperation between the administration staff and the advocate regarding the rest of case expense down payment. Keywords: Case expense collection, simple quick and low cost principle