Add to ORKGKripke, in "Naming and Necessity", defended answers to two kinds of questions about names and reference: a Millian semantics that answers a question of descriptive semantics and a causal account of reference that answers a metasemantic question--a question about what makes a descriptive semantic theory correct. It is argued that the main philosophical work in Kripke's defense of his account of names and reference is done by distinguishing the questions of clarifying the alternative possible answers to them in a way that provides a rebuttal to philosophical arguments that a Millian semantics is impossible
This thesis delineates the boundaries of theories of naming, placing particular emphasis on the dema...
This paper argues for a version of metalinguistic descriptivism, the Mill-Frege view, comparing it t...
In his influential paper 'Speaker's Reference and Semantic Reference', Kripke defends Russell's theo...
Millianism says that the semantic content of a name (or indexical) is simply its referent. This thes...
It is fairly widely accepted that Saul Kripke, Keith Donnellan, and others showed in the 1960s–1980s...
Since the 1960s, Kripke has been a central figure in several fields related to mathematical logic, l...
papers. It was originally to be called Bandersnatches in Dubuque, and Other Philosophical Troubles, ...
Together with an basic assumption of the main thesis of the theory of singular direct reference, thi...
I analyze here some insights of Naming and Necessity that have become especially influential in the ...
Abstract: This paper has two purposes: the first is to critically examine Kripke’s well-known argume...
I undertake a metaphysical investigation of Saul Kripke's modern classic, Naming and Necessity (1980...
In the second lecture of "Naming and Necessity," Saul Kripke presented a new and quite convincing pi...
Saul Kripke in his revolutionary and influential series of lectures from the early 1970s (later publ...
In ‘Semantical Considerations on Modal Logic’, Kripke articulates his project in the discourse of “p...
Philosophical Troubles is the first volume of Saul Kripke’s collected papers. It was originally to b...
This thesis delineates the boundaries of theories of naming, placing particular emphasis on the dema...
This paper argues for a version of metalinguistic descriptivism, the Mill-Frege view, comparing it t...
In his influential paper 'Speaker's Reference and Semantic Reference', Kripke defends Russell's theo...
Millianism says that the semantic content of a name (or indexical) is simply its referent. This thes...
It is fairly widely accepted that Saul Kripke, Keith Donnellan, and others showed in the 1960s–1980s...
Since the 1960s, Kripke has been a central figure in several fields related to mathematical logic, l...
papers. It was originally to be called Bandersnatches in Dubuque, and Other Philosophical Troubles, ...
Together with an basic assumption of the main thesis of the theory of singular direct reference, thi...
I analyze here some insights of Naming and Necessity that have become especially influential in the ...
Abstract: This paper has two purposes: the first is to critically examine Kripke’s well-known argume...
I undertake a metaphysical investigation of Saul Kripke's modern classic, Naming and Necessity (1980...
In the second lecture of "Naming and Necessity," Saul Kripke presented a new and quite convincing pi...
Saul Kripke in his revolutionary and influential series of lectures from the early 1970s (later publ...
In ‘Semantical Considerations on Modal Logic’, Kripke articulates his project in the discourse of “p...
Philosophical Troubles is the first volume of Saul Kripke’s collected papers. It was originally to b...
This thesis delineates the boundaries of theories of naming, placing particular emphasis on the dema...
This paper argues for a version of metalinguistic descriptivism, the Mill-Frege view, comparing it t...
In his influential paper 'Speaker's Reference and Semantic Reference', Kripke defends Russell's theo...