We consider a licensing mechanism for process innovations that combines a license auction with royalty contracts to those who lose the auction. Firms’ bids are dual signals of their cost reductions: the winning bid signals the own cost reduction to rival oligopolists, whereas the losing bid influences the beliefs of the innovator who uses that information to set the royalty rate. We derive conditions for existence of a separating equilibrium, explain why a sufficiently high reserve price is essential for such an equilibrium, and show that the innovator generally benefits from the proposed mechanism
This paper revisits the standard analysis of licensing a cost reducing innovation by an outside inno...
This paper revisits the standard analysis of licensing a cost reducing innovation by an outside inno...
This paper revisits the licensing of a non--drastic process innovation by an outside innovator to a ...
We consider a licensing mechanism for process innovations that combines a license auction with royal...
We consider a licensing mechanism for process innovations that combines a license auction with royal...
We consider a licensing mechanism for process innovations that combines a license auction with royal...
We consider a licensing mechanism for process innovations that combines a license auction with royal...
We consider a licensing mechanism for process innovations that combines a li-cense auction with roya...
This paper reconsiders the licensing of a common value innovation to a downstream duopoly, assuming ...
This paper reconsiders the licensing of a common value innovation to a downstream duopoly, assuming ...
This paper reconsiders the licensing of a common value innovation to a downstream duopoly, assuming ...
This paper reconsiders the licensing of a common value innovation to a downstream duopoly, assuming ...
This paper revisits the licensing of a non--drastic process innovation by an outside innovator to a ...
This paper revisits the standard analysis of licensing a cost reducing innovation by an outside inno...
This paper revisits the standard analysis of licensing a cost reducing innovation by an outside inno...
This paper revisits the standard analysis of licensing a cost reducing innovation by an outside inno...
This paper revisits the standard analysis of licensing a cost reducing innovation by an outside inno...
This paper revisits the licensing of a non--drastic process innovation by an outside innovator to a ...
We consider a licensing mechanism for process innovations that combines a license auction with royal...
We consider a licensing mechanism for process innovations that combines a license auction with royal...
We consider a licensing mechanism for process innovations that combines a license auction with royal...
We consider a licensing mechanism for process innovations that combines a license auction with royal...
We consider a licensing mechanism for process innovations that combines a li-cense auction with roya...
This paper reconsiders the licensing of a common value innovation to a downstream duopoly, assuming ...
This paper reconsiders the licensing of a common value innovation to a downstream duopoly, assuming ...
This paper reconsiders the licensing of a common value innovation to a downstream duopoly, assuming ...
This paper reconsiders the licensing of a common value innovation to a downstream duopoly, assuming ...
This paper revisits the licensing of a non--drastic process innovation by an outside innovator to a ...
This paper revisits the standard analysis of licensing a cost reducing innovation by an outside inno...
This paper revisits the standard analysis of licensing a cost reducing innovation by an outside inno...
This paper revisits the standard analysis of licensing a cost reducing innovation by an outside inno...
This paper revisits the standard analysis of licensing a cost reducing innovation by an outside inno...
This paper revisits the licensing of a non--drastic process innovation by an outside innovator to a ...