In legal disputes, in some cases which judges cannot issue verdict due to the specialty of the matter, an expert or more are assigned by court as requested by parties to issue verdict. Now this question arises is that can the verdict issued based on confession and experts’ perspectives be objected by parties? This study seeks an answer to this question by examining Civil Code and verdicts of Supreme Court as well as current literature
The principle of stability and firmness of contracts has been recognized in laws of obligations as a...
Evidence in the form of an expert opinion is usually of key importance for settling a pending case i...
Evidence in the form of an expert opinion is usually of key importance for settling a pending case i...
In criminal affairs of the law of most countries, including Iran, representation confession all is s...
In criminal affairs of the law of most countries, including Iran, representation confession all is s...
Judicial decision-making is the most significant element of any litigation. Such decision ranged fr...
Courts\' verdicts issued by the judge ideally contain aspects of legal certainty, justice, and utili...
Despite the fact that crime and punishment are personal, in answer to the question of whether other ...
Despite the fact that crime and punishment are personal, in answer to the question of whether other ...
Articles 5 and 7-11 of the Civil Procedure Code have been influenced by Islamic jurisprudence. Artic...
Judges are considered to always know the law (ius curia novit), so the decision must contain adequat...
The confession of a criminal defendant serves as a prosecutor’s most compelling piece of evidence du...
Cognovit actionem leads to a judgment after an action is brought while a modern-day judgment by conf...
Courts’ verdicts issued by the judge ideally contain aspects of legal certainty, justice, and utilit...
Taking into account the fact that in Iranian and French law, formal defects of petition can be recov...
The principle of stability and firmness of contracts has been recognized in laws of obligations as a...
Evidence in the form of an expert opinion is usually of key importance for settling a pending case i...
Evidence in the form of an expert opinion is usually of key importance for settling a pending case i...
In criminal affairs of the law of most countries, including Iran, representation confession all is s...
In criminal affairs of the law of most countries, including Iran, representation confession all is s...
Judicial decision-making is the most significant element of any litigation. Such decision ranged fr...
Courts\' verdicts issued by the judge ideally contain aspects of legal certainty, justice, and utili...
Despite the fact that crime and punishment are personal, in answer to the question of whether other ...
Despite the fact that crime and punishment are personal, in answer to the question of whether other ...
Articles 5 and 7-11 of the Civil Procedure Code have been influenced by Islamic jurisprudence. Artic...
Judges are considered to always know the law (ius curia novit), so the decision must contain adequat...
The confession of a criminal defendant serves as a prosecutor’s most compelling piece of evidence du...
Cognovit actionem leads to a judgment after an action is brought while a modern-day judgment by conf...
Courts’ verdicts issued by the judge ideally contain aspects of legal certainty, justice, and utilit...
Taking into account the fact that in Iranian and French law, formal defects of petition can be recov...
The principle of stability and firmness of contracts has been recognized in laws of obligations as a...
Evidence in the form of an expert opinion is usually of key importance for settling a pending case i...
Evidence in the form of an expert opinion is usually of key importance for settling a pending case i...