Add to ORKGThis review is a critical discussion of three main claims in Debs and Redhead’s thought-provoking book Objectivity, Invariance, and Convention. These claims are: (i) Social acts impinge upon formal aspects of scientific representation; (ii) symmetries introduce the need for conventional choice; (iii) perspectival symmetry is a necessary and sufficient condition for objectivity, while symmetry simpliciter fails to be necessary
It is now standard to interpret symmetry-related models of physical theories as representing the sam...
It is now standard to interpret symmetry-related models of physical theories as representing the sam...
It is now standard to interpret symmetry-related models of physical theories as representing the sam...
This review is a critical discussion of three main claims in Debs and Redhead’s thought-provoking bo...
This review is a critical discussion of three main claims in Debs and Redhead’s thought-provoking bo...
Most observers agree that modern physical theory attempts to provide objective representations of re...
The aim of this paper is to define a methodology that clarifies some crucial aspects of scientific r...
The aim of this paper is to define a methodology that clarifies some crucial aspects of scientific r...
Given its importance in modern physics, philosophers of science have paid surprisingly little attent...
Given its importance in modern physics, philosophers of science have paid surprisingly little attent...
The aim of this paper is to define a methodology that clarifies some crucial aspects of scientific r...
It is now standard to interpret symmetry-related models of physical theories as representing the sam...
By exploring the nature of scientific representative practices, I shall define a methodology that re...
It is now standard to interpret symmetry-related models of physical theories as representing the sam...
It is now standard to interpret symmetry-related models of physical theories as representing the sam...
It is now standard to interpret symmetry-related models of physical theories as representing the sam...
It is now standard to interpret symmetry-related models of physical theories as representing the sam...
It is now standard to interpret symmetry-related models of physical theories as representing the sam...
This review is a critical discussion of three main claims in Debs and Redhead’s thought-provoking bo...
This review is a critical discussion of three main claims in Debs and Redhead’s thought-provoking bo...
Most observers agree that modern physical theory attempts to provide objective representations of re...
The aim of this paper is to define a methodology that clarifies some crucial aspects of scientific r...
The aim of this paper is to define a methodology that clarifies some crucial aspects of scientific r...
Given its importance in modern physics, philosophers of science have paid surprisingly little attent...
Given its importance in modern physics, philosophers of science have paid surprisingly little attent...
The aim of this paper is to define a methodology that clarifies some crucial aspects of scientific r...
It is now standard to interpret symmetry-related models of physical theories as representing the sam...
By exploring the nature of scientific representative practices, I shall define a methodology that re...
It is now standard to interpret symmetry-related models of physical theories as representing the sam...
It is now standard to interpret symmetry-related models of physical theories as representing the sam...
It is now standard to interpret symmetry-related models of physical theories as representing the sam...
It is now standard to interpret symmetry-related models of physical theories as representing the sam...
It is now standard to interpret symmetry-related models of physical theories as representing the sam...