Can some evidence confirm a conjunction of two hypotheses more than it confirms either of the hypotheses separately? We show that it can, moreover under conditions that are the same for nine different measures of confirmation. Further we demonstrate that it is even possible for the conjunction of two disconfirmed hypotheses to be confirmed by the same evidence
Where E is the proposition that [If H and O were true, H would explain O], William Roche and Elliot ...
In this paper, we identify a new and mathematically well-defined sense in which the coherence of a s...
Bayesian confirmation theory is rife with confirmation measures. Zalabardo focuses on the probabilit...
Could some evidence confirm a conjunction of two hypotheses more than it confirms either of the hypo...
The conjunction fallacy has been a key topic in debates on the rationality of human reasoning and it...
Crupi, Fitelson, and Tentori (CFT, forthcoming) offer three conditions that constitute an attempted ...
The conjunction fallacy is the well-documented empirical finding that subjects sometimes rate a conj...
This paper raises a principled objection against the idea that Bayesian confirmation theory can be u...
This paper presents a new analysis of C.G. Hempel's conditions of adequacy for any relation of confi...
Confirmation and falsification are different strategies for testing theories and characterizing the ...
Among Bayesian confirmation theorists, several quantitative measures of the degree to which an evide...
The paper presents a new analysis of Hempel’s conditions of adequacy (Hempel 1945), differing from t...
This paper is devoted to analysis of co-called paradox of confirmation formulated by C. G. Hempel in...
Major recent interpretations of the conjunction fallacy postulate that people assess the probability...
Where E is the proposition that [If H and O were true, H would explain O], William Roche and Elliot ...
In this paper, we identify a new and mathematically well-defined sense in which the coherence of a s...
Bayesian confirmation theory is rife with confirmation measures. Zalabardo focuses on the probabilit...
Could some evidence confirm a conjunction of two hypotheses more than it confirms either of the hypo...
The conjunction fallacy has been a key topic in debates on the rationality of human reasoning and it...
Crupi, Fitelson, and Tentori (CFT, forthcoming) offer three conditions that constitute an attempted ...
The conjunction fallacy is the well-documented empirical finding that subjects sometimes rate a conj...
This paper raises a principled objection against the idea that Bayesian confirmation theory can be u...
This paper presents a new analysis of C.G. Hempel's conditions of adequacy for any relation of confi...
Confirmation and falsification are different strategies for testing theories and characterizing the ...
Among Bayesian confirmation theorists, several quantitative measures of the degree to which an evide...
The paper presents a new analysis of Hempel’s conditions of adequacy (Hempel 1945), differing from t...
This paper is devoted to analysis of co-called paradox of confirmation formulated by C. G. Hempel in...
Major recent interpretations of the conjunction fallacy postulate that people assess the probability...
Where E is the proposition that [If H and O were true, H would explain O], William Roche and Elliot ...
In this paper, we identify a new and mathematically well-defined sense in which the coherence of a s...
Bayesian confirmation theory is rife with confirmation measures. Zalabardo focuses on the probabilit...