Add to ORKGCitation distributions for 1992, 1994, 1996, 1997, 1999, and 2001, which were published in the 2004 report of the National Science Foundation, USA, are analyzed. It is shown that the ratio of the total number of citations of any two broad fields of science remains close to constant over the analyzed years. Based on this observation, normalization of total numbers of citations with respect to the number of citations in mathematics is suggested as a tool for comparing scientific impact expressed by the number of citations in different fields of science
<div><p>The large amount of information contained in bibliographic databases has recently boosted th...
This paper studies massive evidence about references made and citations received after a five-year ...
Bibliometricians are aware that the citation behavior of scientists varies across fields, and for th...
Citation distributions for 1992, 1994, 1996, 1997, 1999, and 2001, which were published in the 2004 ...
This paper has two aims: (i) to introduce a novel method for measuring which part of overall citati...
This paper has two aims: (i) to introduce a novel method for measuring which part of overall citatio...
The commonly used indexes for evaluating the scientific impact of publications and individual resear...
Wide differences in publication and citation practices make impossible the direct comparison of raw...
This paper reviews a number of recent contributions that demonstrate that a blend of welfare econom...
The large amount of information contained in bibliographic databases has recently boosted the use of...
In the case of the scientometric evaluation of multi- or interdisciplinary units one risks to compar...
<div><p>The large amount of information contained in bibliographic databases has recently boosted th...
This paper studies massive evidence about references made and citations received after a five-year ...
Bibliometricians are aware that the citation behavior of scientists varies across fields, and for th...
Citation distributions for 1992, 1994, 1996, 1997, 1999, and 2001, which were published in the 2004 ...
This paper has two aims: (i) to introduce a novel method for measuring which part of overall citati...
This paper has two aims: (i) to introduce a novel method for measuring which part of overall citatio...
The commonly used indexes for evaluating the scientific impact of publications and individual resear...
Wide differences in publication and citation practices make impossible the direct comparison of raw...
This paper reviews a number of recent contributions that demonstrate that a blend of welfare econom...
The large amount of information contained in bibliographic databases has recently boosted the use of...
In the case of the scientometric evaluation of multi- or interdisciplinary units one risks to compar...
<div><p>The large amount of information contained in bibliographic databases has recently boosted th...
This paper studies massive evidence about references made and citations received after a five-year ...
Bibliometricians are aware that the citation behavior of scientists varies across fields, and for th...