In this paper we analyze four national elections held in 1982, 1986, 1989 and 1994\ud in the Netherlands on the occurrence of the Condorcet paradox. In addition, we investigate\ud these elections on the occurrence of three so-called majority-plurality paradoxes. The first\ud paradox states that a party having a majority over another party may receive less seats. The\ud second states that a Condorcet winner may not receive the largest number of seats and even\ud may not receive a seat at all. The third says that the majority relation may be the reverse of the\ud ranking of parties in terms of numbers of seats
Graduation date: 2015Pardoxes in voting has been an interest of voting theorists since the 1800's wh...
In elections with variable (and potentially large) electorates, Brams and Fishburn's No Show Paradox...
The No Show Paradox (there is a voter who would rather not vote) is known to affect every Condorcet ...
Condorcet’s paradox occurs when there is no alternative that beats every other alternative by majori...
We report in this note some results on the theoretical likelihood of Condorcet's Other Paradox in th...
This book argues that strange election outcomes should become less likely as voters' preferences bec...
More and more results from social choice theory are used to argue about collective decision making i...
International audienceFor three-candidate elections, we compute under the Impartial Anonymous Cultur...
Voting paradoxes have played an important role in the theory of voting. They typically say very litt...
General conclusions relating pairwise tallies with positional (e.g., plurality, antiplurality (``vot...
Consider a group of individuals who have to collectively choose an outcome from a finite set of feas...
We consider two no-show paradoxes, in which a voter obtains a preferable outcome by abstaining from ...
We provide intuitive, formal, and computational evidence that in a large society Condorcet's paradox...
The goal of this paper is to propose a comparison of four multi-winner voting rules, k-Plurality, k-...
International audienceIn a two candidate election, it might be that a candidate<br />wins in a major...
Graduation date: 2015Pardoxes in voting has been an interest of voting theorists since the 1800's wh...
In elections with variable (and potentially large) electorates, Brams and Fishburn's No Show Paradox...
The No Show Paradox (there is a voter who would rather not vote) is known to affect every Condorcet ...
Condorcet’s paradox occurs when there is no alternative that beats every other alternative by majori...
We report in this note some results on the theoretical likelihood of Condorcet's Other Paradox in th...
This book argues that strange election outcomes should become less likely as voters' preferences bec...
More and more results from social choice theory are used to argue about collective decision making i...
International audienceFor three-candidate elections, we compute under the Impartial Anonymous Cultur...
Voting paradoxes have played an important role in the theory of voting. They typically say very litt...
General conclusions relating pairwise tallies with positional (e.g., plurality, antiplurality (``vot...
Consider a group of individuals who have to collectively choose an outcome from a finite set of feas...
We consider two no-show paradoxes, in which a voter obtains a preferable outcome by abstaining from ...
We provide intuitive, formal, and computational evidence that in a large society Condorcet's paradox...
The goal of this paper is to propose a comparison of four multi-winner voting rules, k-Plurality, k-...
International audienceIn a two candidate election, it might be that a candidate<br />wins in a major...
Graduation date: 2015Pardoxes in voting has been an interest of voting theorists since the 1800's wh...
In elections with variable (and potentially large) electorates, Brams and Fishburn's No Show Paradox...
The No Show Paradox (there is a voter who would rather not vote) is known to affect every Condorcet ...