The paper analyzes the infinite-horizon alternating-offers bargaining game between agents with inequity-averse preferences. Without prior investments,nthe model predicts a shift of the outcome towards equal division. Asymmetricninvestments affect the ex-post bargaining outcome, giving an advantage to the party that contributed more. Under suitable circumstances, this effectnmay significantly mitigate the hold-up problem. In fact, in a symmetric setup, if production is sufficiently profitable, and parties are sufficiently patient, then the first-best investment levels can be approximated without a co
We consider how the outcome of bargaining varies with changes in the trade-off between equality, eff...
We study the alternating-offers bargaining problem of assigning an indivisible and commonly valued o...
This paper studies the extent to which offers and demands in ultimatum games are consistent with equ...
When investments are specific to a relationship and contracting possibilities are incomplete, the ef...
This note presents a solution to Rubinstein (1982)'s open-ended, alternating-offer bargaining proble...
We investigate an infinite horizon two-person simultaneous offer bargaining game of incomplete infor...
In the hold-up problem incomplete contracts cause the proceeds of relation specific investments to b...
This short paper demonstrates that the equilibrium payoffs of an alternating-offers bargaining game ...
Parties in a bargaining situation may perceive guilt, a utility loss caused by receiving the larger ...
Bargainers in an open-ended alternating-offer bargaining situation may perceive envy, a utility loss...
We revisit the classical alternating-offer bargaining model, further assuming that players cannot re...
The game theoretic prediction for alternating offer bargaining depends crucially on how “the pie” ch...
The standard contract theory adopts the traditional hypothesis of pure self-interest. However, a ser...
In two-stage bargaining games with alternating offers, the amount of the pie that remains after a re...
We consider how the outcome of bargaining varies with changes in the trade-off between equality, eff...
We study the alternating-offers bargaining problem of assigning an indivisible and commonly valued o...
This paper studies the extent to which offers and demands in ultimatum games are consistent with equ...
When investments are specific to a relationship and contracting possibilities are incomplete, the ef...
This note presents a solution to Rubinstein (1982)'s open-ended, alternating-offer bargaining proble...
We investigate an infinite horizon two-person simultaneous offer bargaining game of incomplete infor...
In the hold-up problem incomplete contracts cause the proceeds of relation specific investments to b...
This short paper demonstrates that the equilibrium payoffs of an alternating-offers bargaining game ...
Parties in a bargaining situation may perceive guilt, a utility loss caused by receiving the larger ...
Bargainers in an open-ended alternating-offer bargaining situation may perceive envy, a utility loss...
We revisit the classical alternating-offer bargaining model, further assuming that players cannot re...
The game theoretic prediction for alternating offer bargaining depends crucially on how “the pie” ch...
The standard contract theory adopts the traditional hypothesis of pure self-interest. However, a ser...
In two-stage bargaining games with alternating offers, the amount of the pie that remains after a re...
We consider how the outcome of bargaining varies with changes in the trade-off between equality, eff...
We study the alternating-offers bargaining problem of assigning an indivisible and commonly valued o...
This paper studies the extent to which offers and demands in ultimatum games are consistent with equ...