In this paper I argue against Armstrong’s recent truthmaking account of possibility. I show that the truthmaking account presupposes modality in a number of different ways, and consequently that it is incapable of underwriting a genuine reduction of modality. I also argue that Armstrong’s account faces serious difficulties irrespective of the question of reduction; in particular, I argue that his Entailment and Possibility Principles are both false. Keywords: Armstrong - Truthmakers - Possibility - Reduction - Instantiation - Combinatorialis
I will present and criticise the two theories of truthmaking David Armstrong offers us in Truth and ...
This paper has two components. The first, longer component (sec. 1-6) is a critical exposi...
Does the formula “necessity is truth in all possible worlds ” constitute a reduction of modality? On...
In this paper I argue against Armstrong's recent truthmaking account of possibility. I show that the...
A necessary part of David Armstrong’s account of truthmakers for modal truths is his Possibility pri...
In his criticism of Armstrong’s argument against nominalism, Parsons (1999) makes a crucial use of a...
My aim is to show that theories which try to construct truthmakers out of objects and properties/rel...
This paper attempts to locate, within an actualist ontology, truthmakers for modal truths: truths of...
My aim is to show that theories which try to construct truthmakers out of objects and properties/rel...
Truthmaker theory promises to do some useful philosophical work: equipping us to argue against pheno...
Recent attempts to understand modality have centered upon possible worlds. One view, offered by Davi...
Truthmaker theorists typically claim not only that all truths have truthmakers (Truthmaker Maximalis...
There cannot be a reductive theory of modality constructed from the concepts of sparse particular an...
Truths require truthmakers, many think. In this paper I will discuss the scope of this req...
I will present and criticise the two theories of truthmaking David Armstrong offers us in Truth and ...
This paper has two components. The first, longer component (sec. 1-6) is a critical exposi...
Does the formula “necessity is truth in all possible worlds ” constitute a reduction of modality? On...
In this paper I argue against Armstrong's recent truthmaking account of possibility. I show that the...
A necessary part of David Armstrong’s account of truthmakers for modal truths is his Possibility pri...
In his criticism of Armstrong’s argument against nominalism, Parsons (1999) makes a crucial use of a...
My aim is to show that theories which try to construct truthmakers out of objects and properties/rel...
This paper attempts to locate, within an actualist ontology, truthmakers for modal truths: truths of...
My aim is to show that theories which try to construct truthmakers out of objects and properties/rel...
Truthmaker theory promises to do some useful philosophical work: equipping us to argue against pheno...
Recent attempts to understand modality have centered upon possible worlds. One view, offered by Davi...
Truthmaker theorists typically claim not only that all truths have truthmakers (Truthmaker Maximalis...
There cannot be a reductive theory of modality constructed from the concepts of sparse particular an...
Truths require truthmakers, many think. In this paper I will discuss the scope of this req...
I will present and criticise the two theories of truthmaking David Armstrong offers us in Truth and ...
This paper has two components. The first, longer component (sec. 1-6) is a critical exposi...
Does the formula “necessity is truth in all possible worlds ” constitute a reduction of modality? On...