Cancer and metaph i t r

What concerns me is no rather the way people th Summary Metaphysics, is generally a pleasant, and harm conclusions, nobody is hurt. Suppose that contrary to gene eternal. No harm is done. Some philosophers, like Kant, enASSOCIATION AND CAUSE (3) Cancer is generally incurable. In other words, most state-ments about cancer do not suggest successful treatment, and the vast literature on cancer has to be regarded with skepticism. The physician is flooded by irrelevant infor-mation, and drowns in misinformation. Unaware of this, he attributes treatment failure to the fact that the cause, or etiology of cancer are unknown. Disregarding Hume’s doubts about causality, medicine favors the view that car-cinogens cause cancer. Do they? Take for instance smoking, that is supposed to cause lung cancer. All we know is that smoking and eluded their understanding (2). But suppose that the thing in reasoning for his treatment, metaphysics may occasionally b disease that is haunted by false metaphysical statements. Since cancer is part of medicine, the present discourse d way, or rule of thumb, for distinguishing between correct and patient, they are wrong, and if they aid him, they are correct ‘Big Bang may be hazardous to your health’, are of no appa generally uncertain, the physician continually searches for n metaphysical. In diseases, like cancer, that elude his unders is ready to consider even doubtful suggestions for treatmen metaphysical concepts, he gradually slips into the irrationa