The ability to design an instrument sufficiently versatile to effectively gauge the impact of a scientist’s work within his/her own specialized field is a daunting task—to say the least. Initially, the Journal Impact Factor (JIP) was developed for selecting and comparing the journals within The Science Citation Index (SCI). Unfortunately, it was never intended to evaluate a scientist’s work; rather, it was designed to assess journals. Due to growing dissatisfaction, another technique or instrument was sought whose purpose was to simultaneously evaluate a scientist’s works and the number of citations each work received from other scientists. Just such an instrument emerged: the H-Index. Today, it is rapidly gaining attention from scientists ...
Assessing an individual's research impact on the basis of a transparent algorithm is an important ta...
As academia increasingly turns to bibliometric tools to assess research impact, the question of whic...
As academia increasingly turns to bibliometric tools to assess research impact, the question of whic...
What is the value of a scientist and its impact upon the scientific thinking? How can we measure the...
What is the value of a scientist and its impact upon the scientific thinking? How can we measure the...
Today, the h-index is a widely accepted indicator of sci-entific performance and has become a built-...
The questions in this article were formulated by G. Buela-Casal, the answers were given by J.E. Hirs...
Although the identification of key-performance measures for evaluating scientists is a well-recogniz...
Background: The publication of scientific research is the mainstay for knowledge dissemination, but ...
Abstract How best to evaluate scientists within a peer group is a difficult task. This editorial dis...
Assessing an individual’s research impact on the basis of a transparent algorithm is an important ta...
We apply a new bibliometric measure, the h-index (Hirsch, 2005), to the literature of information sc...
or many years journal impact factor has been used for the evaluation of resear-chers and research ce...
An individual’s h-index corresponds to the number h of his/her papers that each has at least h citat...
It is proposed that since scientific output of individual researchers is not unidimensional, its pop...
Assessing an individual's research impact on the basis of a transparent algorithm is an important ta...
As academia increasingly turns to bibliometric tools to assess research impact, the question of whic...
As academia increasingly turns to bibliometric tools to assess research impact, the question of whic...
What is the value of a scientist and its impact upon the scientific thinking? How can we measure the...
What is the value of a scientist and its impact upon the scientific thinking? How can we measure the...
Today, the h-index is a widely accepted indicator of sci-entific performance and has become a built-...
The questions in this article were formulated by G. Buela-Casal, the answers were given by J.E. Hirs...
Although the identification of key-performance measures for evaluating scientists is a well-recogniz...
Background: The publication of scientific research is the mainstay for knowledge dissemination, but ...
Abstract How best to evaluate scientists within a peer group is a difficult task. This editorial dis...
Assessing an individual’s research impact on the basis of a transparent algorithm is an important ta...
We apply a new bibliometric measure, the h-index (Hirsch, 2005), to the literature of information sc...
or many years journal impact factor has been used for the evaluation of resear-chers and research ce...
An individual’s h-index corresponds to the number h of his/her papers that each has at least h citat...
It is proposed that since scientific output of individual researchers is not unidimensional, its pop...
Assessing an individual's research impact on the basis of a transparent algorithm is an important ta...
As academia increasingly turns to bibliometric tools to assess research impact, the question of whic...
As academia increasingly turns to bibliometric tools to assess research impact, the question of whic...