Bilingualism and special education: Programs and pedagogical issues. Learning Disability Quarterly

Abstract. This paper addresses common assumptions about bilingualism and language acquisition which are relevant to special educators concerned with learn-ing difficulties among minority students. Two opposing assumptions have dominated the policy debate about the effects of bilingual education: the linguistic mismatch and maximum exposure. The former holds that because students cannot learn in a language they do not understand, a home-school language switch will result in academic retardation. According to the maximum exposure assumption, the more exposure minority students receive to English in school the more academic progress they will make. Both assumptions are refuted by the research data which consistently support two theoretical principles that (a) first- and second-language cognitive/academic developments are interdependent and (b) language acquisition is largely dependent on students receiving sufficient com-prehensible input in the target language. These principles are discussed in terms of their implications for program planning and pedagogy for language-minority students who are academically at risk