Add to ORKGThe present study compared the responses of a group of simulating malingerers who were offered a monetary incentive to feign symptoms of a head injury, with the responses of head injured groups both with and without litigation, a forensic parole group, and an honest-responding control group. The following six neuropsychological measures were utilized: Re
This study examined the effectiveness of cautioning and education on simulating a mild traumatic bra...
Forensic psychologists are often asked to determine whether evaluees are providing truthful response...
Over the past 10 years, widespread and concerted research efforts have led to increasingly sophistic...
The present study compared the responses of a group of simulating malingerers who were offered a mon...
Neuropsychological research has primarily focused on identification of malingerers through specializ...
Neuropsychologists are increasingly asked to determine whether a patient may be malingering symptoms...
Interpretation of a patient’s neuropsychological examination involves the determination of the role ...
Clinical neuropsychologists who assess patients following mild closed head injury (CHI) are often as...
Neuropsychologists have an increasing role in the assessment and treatment of individuals suffering ...
Neuropsychologists often assess individuals involved in litigation, and who may be in a position to ...
This study examined patterns of results on standard neuropsychological instruments measuring visual-...
The theory of profile analysis is generally accepted as a basis for forming expert opinions about sy...
multiauthored work. Through its six sections, 45 chapters, and six appendices (divided into multiple...
A large sample of chronic postconcussive patients with and without overt malingering signs was compa...
The aim of the present study was to compare the accuracy of the Amsterdam Short Term Memory (ASTM) t...
This study examined the effectiveness of cautioning and education on simulating a mild traumatic bra...
Forensic psychologists are often asked to determine whether evaluees are providing truthful response...
Over the past 10 years, widespread and concerted research efforts have led to increasingly sophistic...
The present study compared the responses of a group of simulating malingerers who were offered a mon...
Neuropsychological research has primarily focused on identification of malingerers through specializ...
Neuropsychologists are increasingly asked to determine whether a patient may be malingering symptoms...
Interpretation of a patient’s neuropsychological examination involves the determination of the role ...
Clinical neuropsychologists who assess patients following mild closed head injury (CHI) are often as...
Neuropsychologists have an increasing role in the assessment and treatment of individuals suffering ...
Neuropsychologists often assess individuals involved in litigation, and who may be in a position to ...
This study examined patterns of results on standard neuropsychological instruments measuring visual-...
The theory of profile analysis is generally accepted as a basis for forming expert opinions about sy...
multiauthored work. Through its six sections, 45 chapters, and six appendices (divided into multiple...
A large sample of chronic postconcussive patients with and without overt malingering signs was compa...
The aim of the present study was to compare the accuracy of the Amsterdam Short Term Memory (ASTM) t...
This study examined the effectiveness of cautioning and education on simulating a mild traumatic bra...
Forensic psychologists are often asked to determine whether evaluees are providing truthful response...
Over the past 10 years, widespread and concerted research efforts have led to increasingly sophistic...