The purpose of this erratum is to correct several mistakes and to clarify the rationale for the analysis presented in Mueller (2010). These corrections and clarifications do not affect the quantitative results of the maximum-magnitude (mmax) sensitivity analysis that was presented in the article. In two places (first paragraph of the EPRI/SOG and USGS mmax Distributions for Two CEUS Sites section and last paragraph of the Summary and Discussion section) the author incorrectly states that the U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) “required ” updates to the mmax distribu-tions in the application for a site. In fact, the NRC “requested” additional information about the updated mmax distribution used by the South Texas combined-license appl...
In a recent email, K. Heng informed us that the curves he provided, which were used for Figure 2 of ...
International audienceIn the version of this Article originally published, the `Data availability' s...
A Correction to this paper has been published: https://doi.org/10.1140/epjc/s10052-020-08730-
Abstract When a site-specific probabilistic ground-motion estimate is required, the full site-amplif...
incorrect. Because of an error in our database, the mb(Pn) values due to the formula from Evernden (...
There is an error in Equation (12) and in the subsequent description. In fact, Equation (12) should ...
It has been brought to our attention by users of the kine-matic finite-fault models published for th...
The authors would like to apologize for an error in terminology of the original paper ‘Crustal thick...
2noThe original version of this article contained an omission of Acknowledgments section. The correc...
International audience[1] In the paper "High-resolution analysis of the gravest seismic normal modes...
Zöller and Holschneider (2016) propose estimates of the maximum magnitude of induced earthquakes res...
This reply focuses on comments made by Zöller (2017). We sincerely appreciate the comment by Zöller...
Mignan et al. (2015) estimated the maximum rupture lengths for strike-slip faults by applying a mult...
The original version of the article contained some errors in order of generated equations. To get ri...
The USGS hazard maps have significant implications for the nation, states, and local communities, an...
In a recent email, K. Heng informed us that the curves he provided, which were used for Figure 2 of ...
International audienceIn the version of this Article originally published, the `Data availability' s...
A Correction to this paper has been published: https://doi.org/10.1140/epjc/s10052-020-08730-
Abstract When a site-specific probabilistic ground-motion estimate is required, the full site-amplif...
incorrect. Because of an error in our database, the mb(Pn) values due to the formula from Evernden (...
There is an error in Equation (12) and in the subsequent description. In fact, Equation (12) should ...
It has been brought to our attention by users of the kine-matic finite-fault models published for th...
The authors would like to apologize for an error in terminology of the original paper ‘Crustal thick...
2noThe original version of this article contained an omission of Acknowledgments section. The correc...
International audience[1] In the paper "High-resolution analysis of the gravest seismic normal modes...
Zöller and Holschneider (2016) propose estimates of the maximum magnitude of induced earthquakes res...
This reply focuses on comments made by Zöller (2017). We sincerely appreciate the comment by Zöller...
Mignan et al. (2015) estimated the maximum rupture lengths for strike-slip faults by applying a mult...
The original version of the article contained some errors in order of generated equations. To get ri...
The USGS hazard maps have significant implications for the nation, states, and local communities, an...
In a recent email, K. Heng informed us that the curves he provided, which were used for Figure 2 of ...
International audienceIn the version of this Article originally published, the `Data availability' s...
A Correction to this paper has been published: https://doi.org/10.1140/epjc/s10052-020-08730-