An Empirical Study of Operating Systems Errors ^' ooo

We present a study of operating system errors found by automatic, static, compiler analysis applied to the Linux iamd OpenBSD kernels. Our approach differs from previ-ous studies that consider errors found by manual inspec-tion of logs, testing, ajid surveys because static analysis is applied uniformly to the entire kernel source, though our approach necessarily considers a less comprehensive variety of errors than previous studies. In addition, au-tomation allows us to track errors over multiple versions of the kernel source to estimate how long errors remain in the system before they are fixed. We found that device drivers have error rates up to three to seven times higher than the rest of the ker-nel. We found that the largest quartile of functions have error rates two to six times higher than the small-est quartile. We found that the newest quartile of files have error rates up to twice that of the oldest quartile, which provides evidence that code "hardens " over time. Finally, we found that bugs remain in the Linux kernel an average of 1.8 years before being fixed.