Molecular subtyping of Neisseria meningitidis serogroup B: comparison of five methods

In order to compare methods for subtyping Neisseria meningitidis serogroup B isolates, 96 isolates obtained from various locations in the United States and northwestern Europe were subtyped by five methods: mono-clonal antibody (MAb)-based serotyping and serosubtyping, DNA macrorestriction analysis by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE), multilocus enzyme electrophoresis (MEE), ribotyping, and PCR-restriction fragment length polymorphism of the internally transcribed spacer region of the rRNA operon (ITS PCR-RFLP). All N. meningitidis serogroup B isolates were typeable by PFGE, MEE, ribotyping, and ITS PCR-RFLP. Only 44.8% of the isolates were completely typeable (both serotype and serosubtype determination) by MAb-based sero-typing and serosubtyping, 60.4 % of the isolates could be serotyped but not serosubtyped, and 90.6 % of the isolates could be either serotyped or serosubtyped. Simpson’s discrimination indices of diversity for the methods were as follows: PFGE, 99.7%; MEE, 99.4%; ribotyping, 98.8%; MAb serotyping, 75.8%; MAb sero-typing and/or serosubtyping, 97.5%; and ITS PCR-RFLP, 84.2%. The high degree of diversity observed by PFGE, MEE, and ribotyping can be explained by the fact that isolates were collected from different geographic locations at various times. PFGE, MEE, and ribotyping showed greater discriminatory abilities than MAb-based serotyping and serosubtyping or ITS PCR-RFLP. Neisseria meningitidis serogroup B isolates are recognized t