Hart et al. (2012) provide a useful reminder that it can be difficult to distinguish between structures generated by landsliding and those generated by tectonic faulting, and that from an engineering perspective, confusing the two may have profound ramifications when evaluating a site’s geologic stability and seismic hazard. As correctly noted in their introduction, ‘‘…every pattern of tectonic faulting can be produced by landsliding.’ ’ Hart et al. (2012) illustrate this fact with seven examples from the western United States, one of which, the Traverse Mountains of Utah, warrants clarification
[1] The source of the 1897 earthquake is central to longstanding controversies about the genesis of ...
We reply to a comment by Messina et al., who strongly criticized our paper on the San Pio Fault, by ...
control of the presence and orientation of faults in the sedi-mentary section seems unl ikely... [be...
Robert Biek presents several comments on our paper related to the interpretation of the extent of la...
If Hatcher and others (1977) insist on using the terms "mylonitic " and "mylonitizati...
The main aim of the discussion by McGill et al. is to clarify the geometry of the grabens in the Nee...
Studying previously published and other publicly available geologic evidence of Quaternary faulting ...
mistakes, which have been corrected by Westaway (1991). A copy of this correction was sent to Lamb i...
Erslev (1986) presented a geometric model for faults in the Rocky Mountain foreland province which r...
In the canonical cross-sectional reconstruction of relationships at Yerington (Proffett, 1977, Fig...
comment by Y. Ben-Zion on ‘‘Material contrast does not predict earthquake rupture propagation direct...
Comment and reply on the Sevier Desert reflection debate. Comment abstract: Coogan and DeCelles (199...
This reply addresses the three main comments by Shle-mon et al. (2001), namely that our article (1) ...
I thank Buck [this issue] for the opportunity to discuss further the mechanical origin of crustal-sc...
In their comment, Elitez and Yaltirak (2013) criticize our paper (Karabacak et al. 2013) by arguing ...
[1] The source of the 1897 earthquake is central to longstanding controversies about the genesis of ...
We reply to a comment by Messina et al., who strongly criticized our paper on the San Pio Fault, by ...
control of the presence and orientation of faults in the sedi-mentary section seems unl ikely... [be...
Robert Biek presents several comments on our paper related to the interpretation of the extent of la...
If Hatcher and others (1977) insist on using the terms "mylonitic " and "mylonitizati...
The main aim of the discussion by McGill et al. is to clarify the geometry of the grabens in the Nee...
Studying previously published and other publicly available geologic evidence of Quaternary faulting ...
mistakes, which have been corrected by Westaway (1991). A copy of this correction was sent to Lamb i...
Erslev (1986) presented a geometric model for faults in the Rocky Mountain foreland province which r...
In the canonical cross-sectional reconstruction of relationships at Yerington (Proffett, 1977, Fig...
comment by Y. Ben-Zion on ‘‘Material contrast does not predict earthquake rupture propagation direct...
Comment and reply on the Sevier Desert reflection debate. Comment abstract: Coogan and DeCelles (199...
This reply addresses the three main comments by Shle-mon et al. (2001), namely that our article (1) ...
I thank Buck [this issue] for the opportunity to discuss further the mechanical origin of crustal-sc...
In their comment, Elitez and Yaltirak (2013) criticize our paper (Karabacak et al. 2013) by arguing ...
[1] The source of the 1897 earthquake is central to longstanding controversies about the genesis of ...
We reply to a comment by Messina et al., who strongly criticized our paper on the San Pio Fault, by ...
control of the presence and orientation of faults in the sedi-mentary section seems unl ikely... [be...