Add to ORKGA summary of international and national research shows that, in comparison to men, women generally receive less severe judicial outcomes (e.g. sentences) even when they appear before the court under seemingly similar circumstances. Such a finding leads to the questions: How do we interpret these differences between men and women? Is this disparity in criminal court outcomes just or unjust, warrant or unwarranted? In this paper, I will explore these questions by addressing feminist debates of equality versus difference in the context of criminal court sanctioning
Past research examining punitive attitudes has largely ignored gender or relegated it to the periphe...
Peer Editor: Jaime Zucker; Faculty Mentor: Jami Ake This case study examines the impact of sex and g...
Across wide-ranging contexts, academic literature and the popular press have identified pervasive ge...
Using a matched sampling method, this research examined the process of sex-based differentiation in ...
In 1950, Otto Pollak claimed in his book the criminality of women, that female offenders were prefer...
In 1950, Otto Pollak claimed in his book the criminality of women, that female offenders were prefer...
This thesis addresses the complex and often contentious matter of gender difference in criminal cour...
Introduction: For years, crime investigation did not consider female, given the reduced involvement ...
Internationally, the matter of gender difference in criminal court decision making is a contentious ...
Using a matched sampling method, this research examined the process of sex-based differentiation in ...
Gender differences in criminal court outcomes for men and women are almost axiomatic in contemporary...
The relation between gender and criminality is strong, and is likely to remain so. Women have tradit...
Using data from the United States Sentencing Commission (2001-2003), we examine the role of gender i...
Research examining the role of gender in criminal sentencing has focused on gender bias, in that fem...
The 14th Amendment guarantees that Americans are all equal under the law, but in reality this is oft...
Past research examining punitive attitudes has largely ignored gender or relegated it to the periphe...
Peer Editor: Jaime Zucker; Faculty Mentor: Jami Ake This case study examines the impact of sex and g...
Across wide-ranging contexts, academic literature and the popular press have identified pervasive ge...
Using a matched sampling method, this research examined the process of sex-based differentiation in ...
In 1950, Otto Pollak claimed in his book the criminality of women, that female offenders were prefer...
In 1950, Otto Pollak claimed in his book the criminality of women, that female offenders were prefer...
This thesis addresses the complex and often contentious matter of gender difference in criminal cour...
Introduction: For years, crime investigation did not consider female, given the reduced involvement ...
Internationally, the matter of gender difference in criminal court decision making is a contentious ...
Using a matched sampling method, this research examined the process of sex-based differentiation in ...
Gender differences in criminal court outcomes for men and women are almost axiomatic in contemporary...
The relation between gender and criminality is strong, and is likely to remain so. Women have tradit...
Using data from the United States Sentencing Commission (2001-2003), we examine the role of gender i...
Research examining the role of gender in criminal sentencing has focused on gender bias, in that fem...
The 14th Amendment guarantees that Americans are all equal under the law, but in reality this is oft...
Past research examining punitive attitudes has largely ignored gender or relegated it to the periphe...
Peer Editor: Jaime Zucker; Faculty Mentor: Jami Ake This case study examines the impact of sex and g...
Across wide-ranging contexts, academic literature and the popular press have identified pervasive ge...