This paper investigates whether Delaware incorporation relates to cronyism by examining excess director and CEO compensation. I find that excess director compensation is significantly and positively related to excess CEO compensation in both Delaware and non-Delaware firms. However, excess CEO compensation in non-Delaware firms is negatively associated with firm performance. The result indicates that cronyism does exist in non-Delaware firms but not in Delaware firms. Therefore, Delaware incorporation does not favor managers at the expense of shareholders
Abstract New Delaware caselaw in the mid-1990s increased Delaware-incorporated firms' ability t...
Robert Rhee’s Article, The Irrelevance of Delaware Corporate Law, poses provocative questions about ...
In the United States, corporate actors choose their state of incorporation and are only subject to t...
Delaware incorporation is popular among publicly traded firms in the United States. However, the que...
This dissertation consists of three essays on director compensation, CEO compensation, executive dis...
Motivated by agency theory, this study attempts to ascertain whether chief executive compensation is...
This paper presents more evidence that the overpayment of CEOs and directors is symptomatic of agenc...
This paper provides new evidence that correlated abnormal compensation of CEOs and directors is symp...
We model CEO and director compensation using firm characteristics, CEO characteristics, and governan...
This paper provides new evidence that correlated abnormal compensation of CEOs and directors is symp...
Since the 1980s, executive compensation of directors and officers in U.S. Corporations have increase...
Delaware is the state of incorporation for almost two-thirds of the Fortune 500 companies, as well a...
As the leading location for firm incorporations and corporate law, Delaware occupies a unique place ...
Corporate law has done a very bad job on executive pay: executives have been rewarded for stellar pe...
An enduring inquiry for American corporate law scholars is why the small state of Delaware dominates...
Abstract New Delaware caselaw in the mid-1990s increased Delaware-incorporated firms' ability t...
Robert Rhee’s Article, The Irrelevance of Delaware Corporate Law, poses provocative questions about ...
In the United States, corporate actors choose their state of incorporation and are only subject to t...
Delaware incorporation is popular among publicly traded firms in the United States. However, the que...
This dissertation consists of three essays on director compensation, CEO compensation, executive dis...
Motivated by agency theory, this study attempts to ascertain whether chief executive compensation is...
This paper presents more evidence that the overpayment of CEOs and directors is symptomatic of agenc...
This paper provides new evidence that correlated abnormal compensation of CEOs and directors is symp...
We model CEO and director compensation using firm characteristics, CEO characteristics, and governan...
This paper provides new evidence that correlated abnormal compensation of CEOs and directors is symp...
Since the 1980s, executive compensation of directors and officers in U.S. Corporations have increase...
Delaware is the state of incorporation for almost two-thirds of the Fortune 500 companies, as well a...
As the leading location for firm incorporations and corporate law, Delaware occupies a unique place ...
Corporate law has done a very bad job on executive pay: executives have been rewarded for stellar pe...
An enduring inquiry for American corporate law scholars is why the small state of Delaware dominates...
Abstract New Delaware caselaw in the mid-1990s increased Delaware-incorporated firms' ability t...
Robert Rhee’s Article, The Irrelevance of Delaware Corporate Law, poses provocative questions about ...
In the United States, corporate actors choose their state of incorporation and are only subject to t...