incorrect. Because of an error in our database, the mb(Pn) values due to the formula from Evernden (1967) were plotted instead of the intended values of mb(Pn) due to the formula of Denny et. al. (1987). This error only affected the earthquakes in Figure l a and the corrected Figure l a is given below. This error does not change any of the conclusions in the original paper. The corrected Figure la still shows good separation between earthquakes and explosions, independent of magnitude. Best fit regression lines were calculated separately for the earthquake and explosion populations and are shown in Fig. l a. The two populations now have the same slope and show a separation of 1.13 log moment units (lmu). One event treated as an earthquake f...
Abstract: There is a physical basis for the existence of scatter in relationships between the magnit...
This reply focuses on comments made by Zöller (2017). We sincerely appreciate the comment by Zöller...
Bakun (2009) argues that the conclusions of Hough and Hutton (2008) are wrong because the study fail...
Hutton (2008) are wrong because the study failed to take into account the Sierra Nevada attenuation ...
It has been brought to our attention by users of the kine-matic finite-fault models published for th...
A Correction to this paper has been published: https://doi.org/10.1038/s43247-021-00109-
Abstract Magnitude–frequency distributions of volcanic explosion earthquakes that are associated wit...
The purpose of this erratum is to correct several mistakes and to clarify the rationale for the anal...
Nishimura, T., Iguchi, M., Hendrasto, M. et al. Correction to: Magnitude–frequency distribution of v...
International audience[1] In the paper "High-resolution analysis of the gravest seismic normal modes...
The published version of this article, unfortunately, contained error. The corresponding author foun...
In the paper “ Multiple melt injection along a spreading\ud segment at Askja, Iceland ” by Janet Key...
Abstract After publication of this work [1], an error was noticed. Figures 10 and 12 were accidental...
Mignan et al. (2015) estimated the maximum rupture lengths for strike-slip faults by applying a mult...
International audienceIn the version of this Article originally published, the `Data availability' s...
Abstract: There is a physical basis for the existence of scatter in relationships between the magnit...
This reply focuses on comments made by Zöller (2017). We sincerely appreciate the comment by Zöller...
Bakun (2009) argues that the conclusions of Hough and Hutton (2008) are wrong because the study fail...
Hutton (2008) are wrong because the study failed to take into account the Sierra Nevada attenuation ...
It has been brought to our attention by users of the kine-matic finite-fault models published for th...
A Correction to this paper has been published: https://doi.org/10.1038/s43247-021-00109-
Abstract Magnitude–frequency distributions of volcanic explosion earthquakes that are associated wit...
The purpose of this erratum is to correct several mistakes and to clarify the rationale for the anal...
Nishimura, T., Iguchi, M., Hendrasto, M. et al. Correction to: Magnitude–frequency distribution of v...
International audience[1] In the paper "High-resolution analysis of the gravest seismic normal modes...
The published version of this article, unfortunately, contained error. The corresponding author foun...
In the paper “ Multiple melt injection along a spreading\ud segment at Askja, Iceland ” by Janet Key...
Abstract After publication of this work [1], an error was noticed. Figures 10 and 12 were accidental...
Mignan et al. (2015) estimated the maximum rupture lengths for strike-slip faults by applying a mult...
International audienceIn the version of this Article originally published, the `Data availability' s...
Abstract: There is a physical basis for the existence of scatter in relationships between the magnit...
This reply focuses on comments made by Zöller (2017). We sincerely appreciate the comment by Zöller...
Bakun (2009) argues that the conclusions of Hough and Hutton (2008) are wrong because the study fail...