The set of alternatives is infinite. If social welfare function f satisfies the Pareto criterion and there is a positive number β such that each pair of alternatives can be socially ordered without having to consult individual preference over a set with more than β alternatives then there are arbitrarily large finite subsets of X within which f is dictatorial when individual preferences are restricted to a rich subset of profiles
We prove the existence of a Pareto optimal state of a finite society that has socially differentiate...
This version: August 9, 2008In an infinite-horizon setting, Ferejohn and Page showed that Arrow's ax...
A social choice rule g selects a member of a given set of alternative X as a function of individual ...
The set of alternatives is infinite. If social welfare function f satisfies the Pareto criterion and...
The set of alternatives is infinite. If social welfare function f satisfies the Pareto criterion and...
Arrow’s celebrated theorem shows that the aggregation of individ-uals ’ preferences into a social or...
This version: November 2000 (First Version: January 2000)Arrow's celebrated theorem shows that the a...
Can an axiomatic justification be given for the requirement that society picks all and only Pareto o...
This paper examines the implications for social welfare functions of restricting the domain of indiv...
AbstractThis paper extends impossibility theorems of Arrow and others to cases in which social compa...
We characterize the set of strategy-proof social choice functions (SCFs), the outcome of which are m...
This thesis consists of two separate papers in strategy-proof social choice theory. The first paper,...
This paper introduces a new notion of consistency for social choice functions, called self-selectivi...
We take a decision theoretic approach to the classic social choice problem, using data on the freque...
The Gibbard–Satterthwaite (GS) theorem is generalized in three ways: First, it is proved that the th...
We prove the existence of a Pareto optimal state of a finite society that has socially differentiate...
This version: August 9, 2008In an infinite-horizon setting, Ferejohn and Page showed that Arrow's ax...
A social choice rule g selects a member of a given set of alternative X as a function of individual ...
The set of alternatives is infinite. If social welfare function f satisfies the Pareto criterion and...
The set of alternatives is infinite. If social welfare function f satisfies the Pareto criterion and...
Arrow’s celebrated theorem shows that the aggregation of individ-uals ’ preferences into a social or...
This version: November 2000 (First Version: January 2000)Arrow's celebrated theorem shows that the a...
Can an axiomatic justification be given for the requirement that society picks all and only Pareto o...
This paper examines the implications for social welfare functions of restricting the domain of indiv...
AbstractThis paper extends impossibility theorems of Arrow and others to cases in which social compa...
We characterize the set of strategy-proof social choice functions (SCFs), the outcome of which are m...
This thesis consists of two separate papers in strategy-proof social choice theory. The first paper,...
This paper introduces a new notion of consistency for social choice functions, called self-selectivi...
We take a decision theoretic approach to the classic social choice problem, using data on the freque...
The Gibbard–Satterthwaite (GS) theorem is generalized in three ways: First, it is proved that the th...
We prove the existence of a Pareto optimal state of a finite society that has socially differentiate...
This version: August 9, 2008In an infinite-horizon setting, Ferejohn and Page showed that Arrow's ax...
A social choice rule g selects a member of a given set of alternative X as a function of individual ...