The case – control study of mammog-raphy screening by Elmore and colleagues ( 1) raises some interesting points. We agree with the sentiment in the accompa-nying editorial by Harris ( 2) that evalua-tion of breast screening in the community is challenging and worthy of further re-search. We see some of those methodo-logic challenges in the analysis by Elmore et al. The fact that women who died from breast cancer, 75 % of whom had tumors larger than 2 cm, had screening exposures similar to those of the population-based control subjects suggests that the screen-ing programs were ineffective and/o
Background: The effi cacy of breast cancer screening in the community may differ from that suggested...
We would like to comment on the letter by Braillon1 related to our previous article published in thi...
The original publication can be found at www.springerlink.comBackground Efficacy of breast screening...
Randomized trials of mammography have demonstrated the efficacy of mammographic screening for breast...
A case–control study in the Netherlands found that participation in mammography screening reduced th...
van Schoor et al (2011) apply a case–control design to evaluate the Nijmegen breast screening progra...
Thank you for the opportunity to respond to this letter. Bell and Burton question the results of cas...
Abstract: Given recent debate over breast cancer screening reignited by the 25 year follow-up data f...
(IARC) monograph on breast cancer advised (page 91) that: "...The case–control approach is appe...
Abstract In this article, we discuss the most common epidemiological methods used for evaluating the...
The recent, sudden declines in breast can-cer incidence in the United States ( 1, 2) are unprecedent...
Measuring the clinical benefits of computer-aided detection (CAD) in mammographic screening is chall...
We thank J.M. Broeders and S. Moss for their interest in our article (Autier and Boniol, 2012). J.M....
recent results of a randomized trial of breast screening in Canada. At 16 years after randomization,...
We thank Dr Jørgensen for his interest in our study and welcome the opportunity to address the point...
Background: The effi cacy of breast cancer screening in the community may differ from that suggested...
We would like to comment on the letter by Braillon1 related to our previous article published in thi...
The original publication can be found at www.springerlink.comBackground Efficacy of breast screening...
Randomized trials of mammography have demonstrated the efficacy of mammographic screening for breast...
A case–control study in the Netherlands found that participation in mammography screening reduced th...
van Schoor et al (2011) apply a case–control design to evaluate the Nijmegen breast screening progra...
Thank you for the opportunity to respond to this letter. Bell and Burton question the results of cas...
Abstract: Given recent debate over breast cancer screening reignited by the 25 year follow-up data f...
(IARC) monograph on breast cancer advised (page 91) that: "...The case–control approach is appe...
Abstract In this article, we discuss the most common epidemiological methods used for evaluating the...
The recent, sudden declines in breast can-cer incidence in the United States ( 1, 2) are unprecedent...
Measuring the clinical benefits of computer-aided detection (CAD) in mammographic screening is chall...
We thank J.M. Broeders and S. Moss for their interest in our article (Autier and Boniol, 2012). J.M....
recent results of a randomized trial of breast screening in Canada. At 16 years after randomization,...
We thank Dr Jørgensen for his interest in our study and welcome the opportunity to address the point...
Background: The effi cacy of breast cancer screening in the community may differ from that suggested...
We would like to comment on the letter by Braillon1 related to our previous article published in thi...
The original publication can be found at www.springerlink.comBackground Efficacy of breast screening...