This article presents a model of collective choice when group decisions must be justified by arguments from first principles. Individuals may have prefer-ences over both the actions chosen and the arguments used to justify them. Defining a notion of stability in the arguments made and actions supported within a group, I characterize the set of actions that can be justified as well as the arguments that will be used to justify these actions. Of particular interest in the article is the fact that each individual’s preferences over different argu-ments are endogenously determined by the collection of actions justified by the arguments
Judgment aggregation is a field in which individuals are required to vote for or against a certain d...
Judgment aggregation is a field in which individuals are required to vote for or against a certain d...
We introduce a number of logics to reason about collective propositional attitudes that ar...
International audienceOne of the most prominent ways to reach an acceptable collective decision in n...
ABSTRACT. The standard model of collective choice looks at aggregation procedures which take individ...
International audienceCollective decision-making in multi-agents systems is classically performed by...
In this paper, we discuss the approach based on Social Choice Theory and Judgment Aggregation to the...
Consideration of collectives raises important questions about human rationality. This has long been...
This chapter argues that group actions are rational if the individual acts that constitute them are ...
Dung's argumentation frameworks have been applied for over twenty years to the analysis of argument ...
The combination of individual judgments on logically interconnected propositions into a collective d...
In two recent papers Christian List and Philip Pettit have argued that there is a problem in the agg...
This repository provides an implementation of a family of aggregation functions that allow to make c...
Social choice theory is the study of collective decision processes and procedures. It is not a singl...
Each of us makes a number of decisions, from the less important to those with far-reaching consequen...
Judgment aggregation is a field in which individuals are required to vote for or against a certain d...
Judgment aggregation is a field in which individuals are required to vote for or against a certain d...
We introduce a number of logics to reason about collective propositional attitudes that ar...
International audienceOne of the most prominent ways to reach an acceptable collective decision in n...
ABSTRACT. The standard model of collective choice looks at aggregation procedures which take individ...
International audienceCollective decision-making in multi-agents systems is classically performed by...
In this paper, we discuss the approach based on Social Choice Theory and Judgment Aggregation to the...
Consideration of collectives raises important questions about human rationality. This has long been...
This chapter argues that group actions are rational if the individual acts that constitute them are ...
Dung's argumentation frameworks have been applied for over twenty years to the analysis of argument ...
The combination of individual judgments on logically interconnected propositions into a collective d...
In two recent papers Christian List and Philip Pettit have argued that there is a problem in the agg...
This repository provides an implementation of a family of aggregation functions that allow to make c...
Social choice theory is the study of collective decision processes and procedures. It is not a singl...
Each of us makes a number of decisions, from the less important to those with far-reaching consequen...
Judgment aggregation is a field in which individuals are required to vote for or against a certain d...
Judgment aggregation is a field in which individuals are required to vote for or against a certain d...
We introduce a number of logics to reason about collective propositional attitudes that ar...