Confronting Moral Pluralism in Posttraditional Western Societies: Bioethics Critically Reassessed1

In the face of the moral pluralism that results from the death of God and the abandonment of a God’s eye perspective in secular philosophy, bioethics arose in a context that renders it essentially incapable of giving answers to substan-tive moral questions, such as concerning the permissibility of abortion, human embryonic stem cell research, euthanasia, etc. Indeed, it is only when bioethics understands its own limitations and those of secular moral philosophy in gen-eral can it better appreciate those tasks that it can actually usefully perform in both the clinical and academic setting. It is the task of this paper to understand and reevaluate bioethics by understanding these limits. Academic bioethicists can analyze ideas, concepts, and claims necessary to understanding the moral questions raised in health care, assessing the arguments related to these issues, and provide an understanding of the different moral perspectives on bioethical issues. In the clinical setting, bioethicists can provide legal advice, serve as ex-perts on IRBs, mediating disputes, facilitating decision-making and risk man-agement, and clarifying normative issues. However, understanding this is only possible when one understands the history, genesis, and foundations of bioeth-ics and its inability to provide a resolution to postmodern moral pluralism