The factors influencing the European Commission’s decisions under the 2004 Merger Regulation are assessed on a sample of 50 cases. Probit analysis results in the finding that the probability of nonclearance in phase I of the procedure is significantly affected by the estimated market share increase due to the pro-posed merger, the contestability of the market, and the presence of barriers to entry. Furthermore, there is some evidence that the Commission’s decisions are biased against market leaders involved in proposed mergers. I
Abstract: This article proposes an empirical method for finding the determinants of the size of reme...
This paper aims to build and empirically evaluate a discrete choice model of merger remedies as a ba...
Why does the EU Commission delegate the assessment of mergers to national authorities? According to ...
Using a sample of 96 mergers notified to the EU Commission and logit regression techniques, we analy...
Main goal of this thesis is to provide analysis of the key regulatory changes of the European merger...
Main goal of this thesis is to provide analysis of the key regulatory changes of the European merger...
This paper gathers evidence on apparent discrepancies between EU decisions and stock market's a...
The purpose of this study is to examine the factors taken into account by the European Commission (t...
The paper studies how the 2004 merger policy reform affected the probability of a merger being chall...
This paper gathers evidence on apparent discrepancies between EU decisions and stock market's antici...
The main goal of this paper is to empirically test the function of European merger control in light ...
Mergers that substantially lessen competition are challenged by antitrust authorities. Instead of bl...
In this paper we examine a database assembled from an Australian public register of 553 merger decis...
The objective of this Paper is to investigate the determinants of EU merger control decisions. We co...
Mergers that substantially lessen competition are challenged by antitrust authorities. Instead of bl...
Abstract: This article proposes an empirical method for finding the determinants of the size of reme...
This paper aims to build and empirically evaluate a discrete choice model of merger remedies as a ba...
Why does the EU Commission delegate the assessment of mergers to national authorities? According to ...
Using a sample of 96 mergers notified to the EU Commission and logit regression techniques, we analy...
Main goal of this thesis is to provide analysis of the key regulatory changes of the European merger...
Main goal of this thesis is to provide analysis of the key regulatory changes of the European merger...
This paper gathers evidence on apparent discrepancies between EU decisions and stock market's a...
The purpose of this study is to examine the factors taken into account by the European Commission (t...
The paper studies how the 2004 merger policy reform affected the probability of a merger being chall...
This paper gathers evidence on apparent discrepancies between EU decisions and stock market's antici...
The main goal of this paper is to empirically test the function of European merger control in light ...
Mergers that substantially lessen competition are challenged by antitrust authorities. Instead of bl...
In this paper we examine a database assembled from an Australian public register of 553 merger decis...
The objective of this Paper is to investigate the determinants of EU merger control decisions. We co...
Mergers that substantially lessen competition are challenged by antitrust authorities. Instead of bl...
Abstract: This article proposes an empirical method for finding the determinants of the size of reme...
This paper aims to build and empirically evaluate a discrete choice model of merger remedies as a ba...
Why does the EU Commission delegate the assessment of mergers to national authorities? According to ...