Add to ORKGThe exclusionary rule has been the focus of controversy since the United States Supreme Court’s decision in Mapp v. Ohio. Over the years the Supreme Court has narrowed both the scope and the applicability of the exclusionary rule in an effort to find an acceptable balance between the deterrence of police misconduct and needs of the law enforcement. However, examination of recent decisions reveals that controversy over the exclusionary rule has not abated. Thus, while the exclusionary has not been abandoned, the future contours of the rule remain uncertain
Throughout South America, Southern and Eastern Europe, and East Asia, more than two dozen countries ...
In three recent decisions, Hudson v. Michigan, Herring v. United States, and last Term\u27s Davis v....
The benefits accrued through the use of computer and technological advances unfortunately sometimes ...
[U]ntil the [exclusionary rule] rests on a principled basis rather than an empirical proposition, [t...
Since its inception the Exclusionary Rule has been controversial. Originally founded on judicial int...
article published in law journalThis symposium, comprising six articles in addition to this one, was...
In Mapp v. Ohio (1961), the Warren Court held that the so-called exclusionary rule was applicable to...
The exclusionary rule itself is not very complicated: if the police obtain evidence by means that vi...
The exclusionary rule is being flayed with increasing vigor by a number of unrelated sources and wit...
The exclusionary rule is back under the judicial magnifying glass. Recent opinions, most notably by ...
Most contemporary discussions of the exclusionary rule assume or assert that this rule is not pa...
The justices of the Supreme Court have drawn new battle lines over the exclusionary rule. In Hudson ...
Discussions of the merits of the exclusionary rule usually begin and end with a dilemma not unlike t...
Seventy years ago, in the famous Weeks case,\u27 the Supreme Court evoked a storm of controversy by ...
Can we live with the so-called exclusionary rule, which bars the use of illegally gained evidence in...
Throughout South America, Southern and Eastern Europe, and East Asia, more than two dozen countries ...
In three recent decisions, Hudson v. Michigan, Herring v. United States, and last Term\u27s Davis v....
The benefits accrued through the use of computer and technological advances unfortunately sometimes ...
[U]ntil the [exclusionary rule] rests on a principled basis rather than an empirical proposition, [t...
Since its inception the Exclusionary Rule has been controversial. Originally founded on judicial int...
article published in law journalThis symposium, comprising six articles in addition to this one, was...
In Mapp v. Ohio (1961), the Warren Court held that the so-called exclusionary rule was applicable to...
The exclusionary rule itself is not very complicated: if the police obtain evidence by means that vi...
The exclusionary rule is being flayed with increasing vigor by a number of unrelated sources and wit...
The exclusionary rule is back under the judicial magnifying glass. Recent opinions, most notably by ...
Most contemporary discussions of the exclusionary rule assume or assert that this rule is not pa...
The justices of the Supreme Court have drawn new battle lines over the exclusionary rule. In Hudson ...
Discussions of the merits of the exclusionary rule usually begin and end with a dilemma not unlike t...
Seventy years ago, in the famous Weeks case,\u27 the Supreme Court evoked a storm of controversy by ...
Can we live with the so-called exclusionary rule, which bars the use of illegally gained evidence in...
Throughout South America, Southern and Eastern Europe, and East Asia, more than two dozen countries ...
In three recent decisions, Hudson v. Michigan, Herring v. United States, and last Term\u27s Davis v....
The benefits accrued through the use of computer and technological advances unfortunately sometimes ...