I propose modelling boundedly rational agents as agents who are not logically omniscient-that is, who do not know all logical or mathematical implications of what they know. I show how a subjective state space can be derived as part of a subjective expected utility representation of the agent's preferences. The representation exists under very weak conditions. The representation uses the familiar language of probability, utility, and states of the world in the hope that this makes this model of bounded rationality easier to use in applications
Logical omniscience is a never-ending problem in epistemic logic, the main model of full beliefs. It...
Logical omniscience is a never-ending problem in epistemic logic, the main model of full beliefs. It...
Logical omniscience is a never-ending problem in epistemic logic, the main model of full beliefs. It...
for helpful suggestions and conversations. Financial support from the Social Sciences and Humanities...
Standard models of knowledge have the unrealistic property that agents are logically omniscient in t...
Decision theory seems to offer a very attractive normative framework for individual and social choic...
Game and decision theory start from rather strong premises. Preferences, represented by utilities, b...
Naive versions of decision theory take probabilities and utilities as primitive and use expected val...
Naive versions of decision theory take probabilities and utilities as primitive and use expected val...
Purpose This chapter reviews models of decision-making and choice under conditions of certainty. It ...
Purpose This chapter reviews models of decision-making and choice under conditions of certainty. It ...
Purpose This chapter reviews models of decision-making and choice under conditions of certainty. It ...
In real-life decision problems, decision makers are never provided with the necessary background str...
In real-life decision problems, decision makers are never provided with the necessary background str...
In real-life decision problems, decision makers are never provided with the necessary background str...
Logical omniscience is a never-ending problem in epistemic logic, the main model of full beliefs. It...
Logical omniscience is a never-ending problem in epistemic logic, the main model of full beliefs. It...
Logical omniscience is a never-ending problem in epistemic logic, the main model of full beliefs. It...
for helpful suggestions and conversations. Financial support from the Social Sciences and Humanities...
Standard models of knowledge have the unrealistic property that agents are logically omniscient in t...
Decision theory seems to offer a very attractive normative framework for individual and social choic...
Game and decision theory start from rather strong premises. Preferences, represented by utilities, b...
Naive versions of decision theory take probabilities and utilities as primitive and use expected val...
Naive versions of decision theory take probabilities and utilities as primitive and use expected val...
Purpose This chapter reviews models of decision-making and choice under conditions of certainty. It ...
Purpose This chapter reviews models of decision-making and choice under conditions of certainty. It ...
Purpose This chapter reviews models of decision-making and choice under conditions of certainty. It ...
In real-life decision problems, decision makers are never provided with the necessary background str...
In real-life decision problems, decision makers are never provided with the necessary background str...
In real-life decision problems, decision makers are never provided with the necessary background str...
Logical omniscience is a never-ending problem in epistemic logic, the main model of full beliefs. It...
Logical omniscience is a never-ending problem in epistemic logic, the main model of full beliefs. It...
Logical omniscience is a never-ending problem in epistemic logic, the main model of full beliefs. It...