Within a formal epistemic model for simultaneous-move games, we present the following conditions: (1) belief in the opponents ’ rationality (BOR), stating that a player should believe that every opponent chooses an optimal strategy, (2) self-referential beliefs (SRB), stating that a player believes that his opponents hold correct beliefs about his own beliefs, (3) projective beliefs (PB), stating that i believes that j’s belief about k’s choice is the same as i’s belief about k’s choice, and (4) conditionally independent beliefs (CIB), stating that a player believes that opponents ’ types choose their strategies independently. We show that, if a player satisfies BOR, SRB and CIB, and believes that every opponent satisfies BOR, SRB, PB and C...
The purpose of this article is to investigate epistemic conditions for a sequential equilibrium in a...
Game theory provides a well-established framework for the analysis of concurrent and multi-agent sys...
In this paper, we investigate the link between logics of games and mentalisticʺ logics of rational a...
Within a formal epistemic model for simultaneous-move games, we present the following conditions: (1...
We introduce a framework for modeling pairwise interactive beliefs and provide an epistemic foundati...
Nash (1950) proved that, in any strategic game, there is at least one equilibrium in which all playe...
Rational decisions depend on what players know, hence an appropriate epistemic analysis is an integr...
In the classical definition of a game, the players' hierarchies of beliefs are not part of the descr...
The Nash equilibrium concept combines two fundamental ideas. First, rational players choose the mos...
We provide a foundation for correlated rationalizability by means of pairwise epistemic conditions i...
Through examples this chapter illuminates the features that distinguish the ‘con-sistent preferences...
In this paper we focus on dynamic games with almost perfect information, that is, at every stage som...
A consistency condition (action-consistency) on the interim beliefs of players in a game is introduc...
The most common solution concept for a strategic in-teraction situation is the Nash equilibrium, in ...
In this paper we focus on stochastic games with finitely many states and actions. For this setting w...
The purpose of this article is to investigate epistemic conditions for a sequential equilibrium in a...
Game theory provides a well-established framework for the analysis of concurrent and multi-agent sys...
In this paper, we investigate the link between logics of games and mentalisticʺ logics of rational a...
Within a formal epistemic model for simultaneous-move games, we present the following conditions: (1...
We introduce a framework for modeling pairwise interactive beliefs and provide an epistemic foundati...
Nash (1950) proved that, in any strategic game, there is at least one equilibrium in which all playe...
Rational decisions depend on what players know, hence an appropriate epistemic analysis is an integr...
In the classical definition of a game, the players' hierarchies of beliefs are not part of the descr...
The Nash equilibrium concept combines two fundamental ideas. First, rational players choose the mos...
We provide a foundation for correlated rationalizability by means of pairwise epistemic conditions i...
Through examples this chapter illuminates the features that distinguish the ‘con-sistent preferences...
In this paper we focus on dynamic games with almost perfect information, that is, at every stage som...
A consistency condition (action-consistency) on the interim beliefs of players in a game is introduc...
The most common solution concept for a strategic in-teraction situation is the Nash equilibrium, in ...
In this paper we focus on stochastic games with finitely many states and actions. For this setting w...
The purpose of this article is to investigate epistemic conditions for a sequential equilibrium in a...
Game theory provides a well-established framework for the analysis of concurrent and multi-agent sys...
In this paper, we investigate the link between logics of games and mentalisticʺ logics of rational a...